GOOD GUYS FINISH FIRST: DON MANCINI’S DURABLY DERANGED KILLER DOLL RETURNS IN CULT OF CHUCKY
Let’s talk memorable movie killers for a second. Since Mrs.
Bates first slashed her way through the shower curtain in Room 1 of that roadside
motel in Psycho (1960),
franchise-minded murderers have had a hard time of it in the consistency
department, regardless of how strong they may have lunged out of the gate.
Established classics of the genre, like Psycho,
The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Halloween and Nightmare on Elm Street have all given birth to an array of
sequels, remakes and reboots that may have extended their nasty protagonists’
shelf life, but none could approach their origins in terms of frights or
filmmaking quality.
The exception to this rule of inconsistency and ever-diminishing
returns in serial killer movie franchises seems to be the maniac who may have
been the most unlikely to succeed, or certainly to endure, to begin with. He would
be Charles Lee Ray (played with customary intensity by Oscar-nominee Brad
Dourif), the madman who ends up reincarnated and reinvented, in a satiric nod
to the Cabbage Patch mentality of ‘80s toy merchandising, into the body of an
innocuous, mass-produced “Good Guys” doll, and thus set upon a whole new career
of murderous mayhem as Chucky the Killer Doll in 1988’s Child’s Play. Directed by Tom Holland (Fright Night) and co-written by Holland,
John Lafia and Don Mancini, from Mancini’s original story, the movie was a
sizable hit and therefore, given the model of the other popular monsters of the
day, a sequel was most certainly de rigueur.
Child’s Play 2 (1990),
buoyed by Mancini’s inventive screenplay and
John Lafia’s sprightly direction (which improves upon the efficient but
occasionally inelegant work of the journeyman Holland), takes the concept of a
rampaging killer doll seriously enough to render the scares while more deftly
acknowledging the essential silliness of the whole concept, and the result is a
sequel which not only honors its predecessor but even improves upon it.
Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for Child’s Play 3 (1991), which hit
theaters only 10 months after the release of Child’s Play 2 and seemed born not only to capitalize on what was
now clearly a potential cash cow (or dollar doll), but also to fulfill the
widely held perception that the longer a movie serial killer sticks around, the
more tepid the terror becomes. The movie did underwhelming business in the US,
with grosses only slightly exceeding its modest budget, and it seemed that
Chucky’s brief reign as America’s most purposely plastic psychopath might be at
an end.
But, as Chucky himself might say, not so fast. After a
seven-year hiatus, Mancini took a page from the James Whale playbook and made
the move to rather boldly refashion his franchise. (And by this time, it really
was Mancini’s franchise-- along
with Brad Dourif’s voice and the influence of producer David Kirschner,
credited with the Chucky doll’s original design, Mancini’s
writing was and still is the most important creative element to remain consistent throughout the Chucky series, lending the whole enterprise a degree of personal
investment that no other horror franchise can claim.) Mancini chose to more
openly reference the humorous and satiric possibilities of his basic premise,
its implicit connection to the very history of horror, and, like Whale before
him, even began to hint at the gay sensibility that informed it. (Mancini
himself is out and proud.) Bride of Chucky (1998), not only
introduced those elements, very much making it to Child’s Play what The Bride
of Frankenstein (1935) was to its
landmark predecessor, but it also brought Jennifer Tilly into the Chucky
family as Tiffany Valentine, Charles Lee Ray’s still-human and equally antisocial
girlfriend who, through an escalating and baroque set of circumstances, finds
her own soul also trapped in the body of an appropriately voluptuous doll.
The resulting film, an engaging hybrid of horror thriller,
road movie and satire of middle-class domesticity, was directed by Hong Kong
veteran Ronny Yu (The Bride with White
Hair) and shot by Peter Pau, whose next project, Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon, would win him the Academy Award, and
it’s a visual feast, especially compared to the previous three pictures. Bride was also a Chucky-universe
game-changer, its embrace of the comic potential of the franchise premise (and its
strong box-office numbers) setting the stage, after another relatively lengthy
hiatus, for the series’ most controversial and divisive movie, 2004’s Seed of Chucky, a no-holds-barred, blood-soaked farce that confused and put
off a good portion of the built-in Chucky audience who would have had little
objection to continuing the march toward the formulaic that Child’s Play 3 seemed to promise.
Few, in fact, were ready for the relatively radical
departure from formula that Mancini served up, a blistering lampoon of insular
Hollywood culture featuring a spectacular turn by Tilly not only as Tiffany but
also as “Jennifer Tilly,” a grandly entertaining act of diva character
self-assassination which may have no equal in the history of any movie genre. And
that’s not all, folks. Seed also
casts Chucky and Tiffany as conflicted parents in a Hardly-Ordinary People scenario involving their gender-conflicted
son Glen (or Glenda), voiced in impossibly touching, comically dexterous fashion
by Billy Boyd (Pippin in The Lord of the
Rings), right alongside the expected cornucopia of eviscerations, roasted
corpses, death by acid bath and assorted voodoo-induced soul transferences.
Seed of Chucky was
also Mancini’s directorial debut, the official handing over of the Chucky
franchise to the one creative force who seemed best positioned to shepherd it
forward, and it saw him at serious work developing the visual acuity that Yu
seemed to inspire. More than anything, Seed
found Mancini working out the influence of Brian De Palma’s insouciant
pictorial wit, and it even features a rousing score by Pino Donaggio (Carrie, Dressed to Kill, Blow Out). But
audiences didn’t bite, and even some of the Chucky faithful felt betrayed by
Mancini’s unapologetic dive into the deep end of viscera-smeared burlesque at the expense
of more familiar, conventionally mounted thrills.
Nine years later, writer-director Mancini rebounded with Curse of Chucky (2013), which in
part served as a response to those who complained that Chucky wasn’t scary
anymore, a chance to prove that a more straightforward approach to the material
could still deliver the jolts. The movie sidestepped the dread of a simple Child’s Play reboot, extending instead
to a story that incorporates the history of Charles Lee Ray (Brad Dourif
appearing bodily for the first time) and a strong new character, the
wheelchair-bound Nica Pierce (played by Dourif’s daughter, Fiona), set against
the evil of Chucky amidst the confines of a shadow-rich, very old, dark house. Mancini
didn’t entirely eschew humor in Curse,
but it’s clear that the film represents a distinct move to reestablish Chucky’s
dominance as a figure of fear, and the result is that while the tone is much
less overtly comic, the laughs that do arrive are more integrated to the
pitch-black tone of the entire piece. (Chucky was always on some level a
quipster, so any attempt to avoid the laugh lines would be as much a betrayal
of the Chucky legacy as some purported Seed
to be; and of course, some did complain that the new movie wasn’t funny enough.) Curse was also the first film of the franchise to be released
straight to Blu-ray and digital downloads, and the financial success which
followed, combined with the strongest reviews of any Chucky film to date, did
much to dispel the perceived stigma of direct-to-video releases as a wasteland
bereft of quality or prestige, at around the same time that Netflix (and later
Amazon) were doing the same thing.
But as Bride and Seed have proved, Mancini turned out to
be a filmmaker not entirely comfortable with the notion of resting on the few
laurels that might come his way while working in such a “disreputable” genre as
horror. In the wake of the successful premiere of Curse, Mancini served as a producer and wrote two episodes of the
critically acclaimed Hannibal during
its third (and final?) 2015 season, and as a writer and supervising producer for the
first two seasons of SyFy’s sensational horror anthology series Channel Zero, all while concocting and shooting the seventh film in the
Chucky series, which drops, presumably from horror heaven, on Blu-ray and
digital download this Tuesday, October 3.
The movie Chucky fans have waited four years to see is
called Cult of Chucky (2017), and I’m guessing it’s going to be the one
to unite, in this profoundly fractured age in which we live, those who pine for
the straight-up gory days with the audiences who have always enthusiastically embraced
the series’ envelope-bursting exploration of its own satiric potential, as most
vividly expressed in Bride and
especially Seed. The simple fact is,
the through-line of Don
Mancini's role as chief creative force in the Chucky series has ensured its
standing, improbable as such a thing may have seemed in 1988, as the inarguable
best and most consistently provocative series of its kind.
Mrs.
Bates, Leatherface and Freddy Krueger all got groundbreaking classics, then a
dribbling run of increasingly useless “sequels” and reboots and remakes for
their trouble (though The Texas Chainsaw
Massacre Part 2 was a hoot and Wes
Craven’s New Nightmare proved a fascinating, franchise-capping experiment
in meta-awareness); Michael Myers had one good Halloween night; Pinhead
disappeared into the hellraising wilderness of Blockbuster Video shelf filler;
and Jason’s adventures at Camp Crystal Lake were never any good to begin with,
which I suppose would qualify the Friday
the 13th series as the most consistent slasher franchise of all.
But somehow the Chucky saga just keeps getting better, crazier, more inventive.
Cult of Chucky is packed to the
cackling rafters with surprises, jolts, laughs—none of which will be spoiled
here— and serves as a smashing showcase for Mancini’s continuing growth as a
director of considerable finesse and visual expressiveness.
When
we last left Nica (Fiona Dourif), she had been handily framed by her
battery-operated bête noire and convicted of the
murders that, of course, Chucky committed. And speaking of commitment, Curse ended with one for Nica, into a
maximum-security mental hospital where her future could only be deemed
unpromising. But the movie was also tagged with a last-minute surprise
appearance by Chucky’s original BFF, Andy Barclay (played by original Child’s Play child-actor-turned-grownup
Alex Vincent), who has spent his journey toward adulthood perpetually tortured
by the memory of his redheaded, two-foot-tall tormentor. In Curse’s final images, Andy takes violent
steps to begin exacting a systematic torture-revenge on Chucky which is extended,
in satisfyingly surreal fashion, into the opening action of Cult.
Nica,
having been sedated by her attending psychiatrist (Michael Therriault) into
accepting responsibility for the murders in the last film, is transferred to a
minimum-security facility, where her attempts to salvage her sanity are
undermined not only by some of the patients in her therapy group, but also by
her doctor’s introduction into therapy of a vintage Chucky doll (“I got it at
Hot Topic.”) to ostensibly help her erase her lingering belief in Chucky’s
malevolent bent and face her own guilt. This development, which for all the world looks, in the movie’s
trailer, like just another (strained) attempt to get Chucky inside the locked
doors of the facility, all the better for the lunatic to really take over the
asylum, is slowly turned on its head—the doll is adopted instead by another
patient, Madeleine (Elizabeth Rosen, channeling a young Lilli Taylor), whose
own mental fragility may have something to do with a past history of
infanticide.
But it turns out, Chucky having been a mass-produced toy, after all, that there are plenty of killer dolls to go around. When more than one Chucky shows up inside the walls of Harrogate Hospital, Mancini starts cranking up the guessing game. Just which one is the real murderous moppet? Or maybe, somehow, they all are. And what about that mutilated object of torture locked up in Andy’s den, the one who looks not like a Good Guys toy but instead like the evolved Bride/Seed/Curse-era Chucky and who cackles and cracks wise just like Brad Dourif? Maybe we’re all as crazy as Nica is supposed to be.
But it turns out, Chucky having been a mass-produced toy, after all, that there are plenty of killer dolls to go around. When more than one Chucky shows up inside the walls of Harrogate Hospital, Mancini starts cranking up the guessing game. Just which one is the real murderous moppet? Or maybe, somehow, they all are. And what about that mutilated object of torture locked up in Andy’s den, the one who looks not like a Good Guys toy but instead like the evolved Bride/Seed/Curse-era Chucky and who cackles and cracks wise just like Brad Dourif? Maybe we’re all as crazy as Nica is supposed to be.
Not
to worry. Mancini has concocted a clever and involving scenario that, if the crowd
I saw it with last week is any indication, successfully thwarts just about
every attempt at audience second-guessing and fulfills, with plenty of pleasurably
assured filmmaking bravado, the giddy and genuinely shocking implications of
the movie’s alliterative title.
What’s most exciting about this latest chapter, beside its confident extension
of the Chucky saga well beyond the lazy, regurgitative storytelling that has
earmarked so many other horror movie sequels, is the manner in which Mancini
honorably delivers the goods, replacing cynicism with the desire to surprise and
delight his audience with an imaginative jolt of a tale that by now has also
taken on, for Chucky’s fans as well as his creator, a very personal resonance.
But the movie is memorable not just for the gory spectacle of Chucky’s kills which, back in the day, might have been enough. Director Mancini has considerably upped his game, and our experience, by capitalizing on the lessons learned from all those De Palma allusions—split diopter effects, split-screens, overhead tracking shots and the like—which have informed every Chucky film since Bride. With Cult of Chucky, in the way the movie extracts so much teasing visual and aural delight from its giddily nightmarish circumstances, Mancini moves beyond allusion and reveals himself to be a legitimate heir to De Palma in his prime. If Bride, Seed and Curse were movies that were clearly informed by De Palma’s expressive use of editing and the camera, then Cult of Chucky is the first movie in the series so drunk on its own premise that it feels as if it might have actually been directed by the artist who so pleasurably choreographed movies like Sisters, Raising Cain and The Fury, pictures which charge ahead in their conviction that they’ve got what it takes to rattle and excite an audience through pure movie love alone. The way Mancini adapts and improves on what was a perfectly satisfying murder-by-shattered-overhead-mirror sequence from Bride for a bravura sequence in Cult—a gorgeous diorama of death staged in a sky-lit hospital room in which shards of glass slow-motion mingle with falling snow before the execution of a shocking (and shockingly emotional) finish—is all the evidence you’d need to suspect that there might just be a Carrie or a Dressed to Kill in this director’s future.
But the movie is memorable not just for the gory spectacle of Chucky’s kills which, back in the day, might have been enough. Director Mancini has considerably upped his game, and our experience, by capitalizing on the lessons learned from all those De Palma allusions—split diopter effects, split-screens, overhead tracking shots and the like—which have informed every Chucky film since Bride. With Cult of Chucky, in the way the movie extracts so much teasing visual and aural delight from its giddily nightmarish circumstances, Mancini moves beyond allusion and reveals himself to be a legitimate heir to De Palma in his prime. If Bride, Seed and Curse were movies that were clearly informed by De Palma’s expressive use of editing and the camera, then Cult of Chucky is the first movie in the series so drunk on its own premise that it feels as if it might have actually been directed by the artist who so pleasurably choreographed movies like Sisters, Raising Cain and The Fury, pictures which charge ahead in their conviction that they’ve got what it takes to rattle and excite an audience through pure movie love alone. The way Mancini adapts and improves on what was a perfectly satisfying murder-by-shattered-overhead-mirror sequence from Bride for a bravura sequence in Cult—a gorgeous diorama of death staged in a sky-lit hospital room in which shards of glass slow-motion mingle with falling snow before the execution of a shocking (and shockingly emotional) finish—is all the evidence you’d need to suspect that there might just be a Carrie or a Dressed to Kill in this director’s future.
Also included in the Cult’s company, a return appearance by the series’ guardian/avenging angel Jennifer Tilly, which ends up feeling, perhaps improbably, less important than the presence of Fiona Dourif, who battles deliciously with her dad (in fine form here yet again) for the title of Heart of the Franchise. Mancini clearly loves what Dourif brings to the party so much that he manages to reward Nica with a fate that would feel inevitable if we’d only the imaginative capacity to anticipate it. (That audiences won’t is as much a tribute to Dourif’s conviction as to Mancini’s cleverness.)
There
are plenty of organically welcome twists and turns in this episode, and even a
clunky expository moment or two which are quickly forgiven through the abundance
of shivers and laughs. But the ultimate trajectory of this Cult will not be ruined by Yours Truly, and it’s my advice that you
avoid any review which looks to be any more than 10% plot recitation before
seeing for yourself this terrific new addition to the legacy of the movies’ shortest,
most defiantly plasticine maniac. Cult of
Chucky finds the sweet spot where humor and horror coexist better than any
of the previous entries, and in the process happily, and with demonic relish, cements
the status of the Chucky franchise as the most durable, elastic and
creatively deranged horror series since the heyday of the Universal monster
classics of the ’30s and ‘40s. Now, there’s
a cult worth joining, and Mancini can rest easy in the knowledge, as his Cult is unleashed upon the public this
coming Tuesday, that he’s honorably earned a lifetime charter membership among the
scariest in the business.
***********************************************
FOR FURTHER READING (AND LISTENING):
On Seed of Chucky:
"The Little Redheaded Killer Who Could"
On Curse of Chucky: "With Six You Get Screaming"
On Jennifer Tilly: "The High Spirit, Sharp Wit and Sexy Self-Deprecation of Jennifer Tilly"
Shock Waves Podcast Episode
#67: Don Mancini talks Cult of Chucky
**************************************************
**************************************************
1 comment:
I completely agree with this review, Dennis. This franchise is too often overlooked - when in fact "Chucky" is the most fascinating, complex and intelligent franchise in all of horror. And regarding Don Mancini - the man is a poet and a genius. Why he isn't directing major feature films is beyond me. But soon, no doubt, soon...
Post a Comment