NAVIGATING UNDEADLAND: WORLD WAR Z
In the absence of much in the way of political complexity or
deep-dish social commentary, the relative intimacy at the heart of World War Z,
amid the global devastation of an unexplained viral zombie
attack, is perhaps the summer’s biggest movie surprise so far. (The
complexities and social observations that characterize Dawn of the Dead and subsequent movies in the George A. Romero
canon were never that deep-dish to begin with, if you ask me.) WWZ, directed with
heartening fluency and a facility for coherent, intelligently applied tension
by Marc Forster (Monsters Ball, Quantum
of Solace), quickly establishes quiet unease with reports of mysterious
disturbances in nature and in civilized society. Then all irrational hell breaks loose,
starting with the way our awareness of the onset of the horror runs parallel to
those of the characters, expanding from the ease and protection afforded ex-UN
peacekeeper Brad Pitt and family (in their home and then from inside their car)
as the illusion of their safety is slowly eroded away from the outside.
After seeing the trailers, I fully expected World War Z to
be one relentless big-budget zombie-kill sequence after another (or, as David
Edelstein termed it, just another goddamn zombie movie). But this epic moves in
some satisfyingly mysterious ways, specifically in reverse, from grandiose to
the more microcosmic. The terrifying sequence of the family’s desperate flight
from chaos and search for shelter establishes the movie’s focus, but its chills
are nearly matched later on in a scene which couldn’t feel more different. In one
of the movie’s more quietly devastating moments, Pitt’s wife (Mireille Enos) and
daughters, who have been floating safely at sea on an aircraft carrier with
naval and UN officials and other VIPs, are relocated to a ground-based quarantine
camp to make room for others after Pitt is mistakenly assumed dead, and the
look in the mother’s eyes says everything she suspects, but dare not verbalize,
about their newly reshuffled chances for survival on land.
After Philadelphia falls, we follow Pitt, recruited with a
twist of emotional blackmail by the government to search out the origins of the
outbreak, into a walled-in Jerusalem which is soon overtaken by shrieking
Zekes, Army-speak for that other “Z” word. (The Jerusalem section is, despite
the frightening, apparently already iconic sight of the undead swarming over that
protective wall, also the movie’s most formulaic-- Romero by way of Black Hawk Down.)
From there, the focus is further reduced to the jet airbus on which Pitt and a horribly wounded Israeli soldier escape certain doom on the ground, only to be faced with the inescapable worst once airborne. Finally, the fight to save humanity is brought into the eerily hushed halls of a Welsh W.H.O. compound where Pitt and a group of surviving researchers must navigate around 30 or so ex-colleagues-turned-flesh-eaters that are wandering the halls, literally standing and shuffling (and eventually sprinting) in the way of a possible vaccine.
From there, the focus is further reduced to the jet airbus on which Pitt and a horribly wounded Israeli soldier escape certain doom on the ground, only to be faced with the inescapable worst once airborne. Finally, the fight to save humanity is brought into the eerily hushed halls of a Welsh W.H.O. compound where Pitt and a group of surviving researchers must navigate around 30 or so ex-colleagues-turned-flesh-eaters that are wandering the halls, literally standing and shuffling (and eventually sprinting) in the way of a possible vaccine.
The movie ends not with a bang or a whimper or, de rigueur
for the genre, a cynical scream, but instead on a note of hope that seems
right, given the trajectory of the movie from the grandest canvas down to the
most unexpectedly quiet, even if it feels like a bit of a fizzle in the context
of a summer movie spectacular. I completely understand those who complain that
the relatively subtle political awareness of Max Brooks’ novel has gone
unserved (ignored, really) by the spectacle-by-committee that is World War Z.
But given the many ways that fidelity to Brooks’ oral history strategy could
have turned a more faithful translation into just another disaster movie
sporting a blue-ribbon international cast, the movie we actually have before us
this summer stands to be appreciated for what it is rather than dismissed for
what it is not. It’s a movie that, for all of its concessions to demographic
research and the contours of the international market, still feels unexpected, one
which could have regurgitated the tiresome Roland Emmerich-approved template of
escalating geographical destruction, but instead boils down to the sacrifice of
a single man looking the most fearsome horror right in its milky, dead eyes.
********************************************
********************************************
1 comment:
Fine look at this one, Dennis. I quite enjoyed it.
Post a Comment