THE 2013 WHITE ELEPHANT BLOG-A-THON-- CRIMSON MERCY: RED ANGEL (1966)
Red Angel is a
decidedly nonhysterical movie about madness, specifically, the madness of war, but
also the delirium of love, the levels of humiliation and ecstasy which can
often be the final destination of romantic and sexual desire, and how the one
can inform and overwhelm the other. In fact, the movie is frequently and
paradoxically beautiful, visually, in its measured view of both the ghastly
horrors of violated bodies, on the battlefield and spread out on the floor of a
mobile army hospital, and in the repose from those horrors taken by Nurse Nishi
(Ayako Wakao), the titular scarlet-stained merciful vessel, an inexperienced
Japanese army nurse who finds herself confronted with violence from expected
and unexpected places while serving on the Chinese front during World War II.
Ayako is quietly spectacular in the role, a sturdy, graceful performance which, for all its incumbent harsh surroundings, couldn't be less ostentatious. Her introduction to the grim circumstances of the war comes first courtesy of a harshly matter-of-fact head nurse, who details expectations in the military hospital where she is first stationed, and rapidly thereafter at the mercy (or lack thereof) of a group of hospitalized soldiers who first sexually intimidate her and then carry through on their threats by viciously gang-raping her. Nishi, nicknamed Sakura-- Japanese for “cherry blossom,” a bloom noted for its short life-- is as idealized a character as that nickname implies. She bears up under the assault, and the prospect of more to come, with a steely reserve that never betrays the cold heart of anger or even apparent fear. She fully looks as though she’s resigned to taking as much abuse as these maddened soldiers, specified emblems and victims of the war itself, can dish out. It’s a resolve that is matched only by her tireless and unflinching efforts in the operating room, where director Yasuzo Masamura, filming the script by Ryozo Kazahara which was itself adapted from Yoriyoshi Arima’s novel, holds back little in the way of ghastly visions of limbs sawed and separated from bodies in often vain attempts, sans anesthesia, to save already shattered lives.
Ayako is quietly spectacular in the role, a sturdy, graceful performance which, for all its incumbent harsh surroundings, couldn't be less ostentatious. Her introduction to the grim circumstances of the war comes first courtesy of a harshly matter-of-fact head nurse, who details expectations in the military hospital where she is first stationed, and rapidly thereafter at the mercy (or lack thereof) of a group of hospitalized soldiers who first sexually intimidate her and then carry through on their threats by viciously gang-raping her. Nishi, nicknamed Sakura-- Japanese for “cherry blossom,” a bloom noted for its short life-- is as idealized a character as that nickname implies. She bears up under the assault, and the prospect of more to come, with a steely reserve that never betrays the cold heart of anger or even apparent fear. She fully looks as though she’s resigned to taking as much abuse as these maddened soldiers, specified emblems and victims of the war itself, can dish out. It’s a resolve that is matched only by her tireless and unflinching efforts in the operating room, where director Yasuzo Masamura, filming the script by Ryozo Kazahara which was itself adapted from Yoriyoshi Arima’s novel, holds back little in the way of ghastly visions of limbs sawed and separated from bodies in often vain attempts, sans anesthesia, to save already shattered lives.
Director Masamura early on makes a strange but thematically
resonant connection between the rape and Nishi’s duties as a nurse which ripples
through the film and heighten its emotional effect. Nishi is held down by her
attackers, all four limbs rendered helpless against the assault, in much the
same way that Nishi, in concert with the rest of the surgical staff, must restrict
the movements of soldiers whose limbs they must amputate. Later, fate reunites
Nishi with her first attacker, and this time it is he who is immobilized and at
her mercy, on the operating table. Rather
than neglect him, she does her best to preserve his life, not wanting him to
die thinking that she allowed to slip away from life out of a sense of
vengeance, even though her efforts are ultimately futile. The operating theaters
are dark and cold and forbidding chambers where the meaning of acts of morality
tend to get blurred, lost in the shadows and the pools of blood gathering on
the filthy floors.
Masamura’s wide-screen, black and white imagery serves the
murky atmosphere of these makeshift corpse factories well. His mise-en-scene
has a strange serenity about it, simultaneously documentary in quality-- you
never mistake the gushers of blood and sounds of screams and breaking flesh for anything but realistic-- yet also subjective and slightly woozy, as if the
camera itself had been anesthetized, taking in the gruesome sights and sounds
with a calm that is clearly reflective of Nishi’s own, yet still able to
clearly convey the pain stitched through the imagery like compromised fields of
nerves and veins. The documentary and the surreal often get tangled up in
images too, like the one of a basket full of arms and legs looking not as much like
the discards of military surgery as surgical implements stacked neatly in a container,
awaiting their moment. I had to quickly look, look away, and look back to make
sure I was seeing exactly what it was I was seeing.
Masamura further escalates his strange emotional brew when
Nishi is assigned duty at a hospital on the front under the command of Dr. Okabe
(Shinsuke Ashida). She quickly bonds with, and becomes a sort of merciful lover
to an armless soldier; Masamura’s handling of their encounters are beautifully
rendered, deftly comingling eroticism with imagery of extreme physical scarring
that somehow manages to denude that imagery of its most sensational, prurient aspects.
But it is to Okabe that Nishi seems most
instantly attracted, to his forthrightness and sense of duty, of course, but
also to his sense of helplessness in the face of such overwhelming human need,
and to the doctor’s wavering conviction—he’s no longer sure that saving, or
prolonging, some of these lives is even the right thing to do. When Okabe orders
Nishi to his quarters after their shift is over, we brace ourselves for yet the
next humiliation to be visited upon this strangely composed woman. But we soon
discover that he longs only for Nishi’s company, and her medical skill at
administering the nightly doses of morphine he needs to dull his psychic pain
and allow sleep to overtake him. The naturalistic pace and tone of their scenes
together are wonderful. These two drift around each other’s military assignations and
professional attachments toward a mutual love—one which, on Nishi’s part, may
also be informed by a serious case of father replacement syndrome. Their scenes together waiting for dawn, for sleep, for an unlikely connection, make nuanced, painful yet also delightful dances of delayed gratification.
With just the wrong emphasis or shift in tone, Red Angel might be easily dismissed as
lurid romantic trash hiding under the pretensions of an antiwar statement. But
it is a measure of Masamura’s achievement that the film avoids becoming a
wallow in either political opportunism, the swooning theatrics of longing under
extreme duress, or even the uncomfortably realistic surgical nightmares which
it occasionally makes us privy to. And it resists the temptation to fall into
these traps in the most subdued of means, through a directorial style that
might seem at first detached, but whose careful attention to detail and
restraint and genuine feeling actually reveals a heartfelt humanist sensibility
which blossoms without the need for excessive congratulation—even Nishi’s
measured response to her own trials at the beginning of the film come to seem
marked more by a recognizable humanity than simply by impossible fortitude, and
that’s because of the way Masamura guides us through what she sees and feels,
as she makes her way toward the inevitable transcendence of the film’s
conclusion.
*********************************************
Before making his own films, Yasuzo Masamura trained with
the likes of Federico Fellini and Michelangelo Antonioni (Antonioni would one
day even name Masamura as one of his favorite directors), and though he has not
been universally acclaimed he is considered in some circles to be one of the
greats of the new wave of Japanese filmmakers that also included Akira Kurosawa
and Yazujiro Ozu. And up until this viewing of Red Angel, I was unfamiliar with the name Yasuzo Masamura. Considering
that my previous adventures in the White Elephant Blog-a-thon, for which this
piece has been respectfully, if somewhat tardily submitted, have sent me down
the respective rabbit holes of Stewart Raffill (Mannequin 2: On the Move) and Alan Parker (The Life of David Gale), it is quite an unexpected treat to get to
write about a movie for this annual festivity that is actually good, and to
discover Masamura, definitely a subject for my own further very interested review.
I don’t know who I have to thank, but I shall thank them nonetheless. Stacia,
who had to review the movie I submitted, Robert Mulligan’s stagnant 1979 adaptation
of Bernard Slade’s Broadway chestnut Same
Time Next Year, is probably not feeling so generous toward me. You can check
out links to Stacia’s hilarious, outrage-filled piece, and all the reviews for
this year’s White Elephant Blog-a-thon, at Paul Clark’s Silly Hats Only.
**********************************************
1 comment:
I'm so glad you liked this! This was my submission. I'm glad that you were able to get a hold of the film. When Steve Carlson told me that Red Angel was on "short wait" on Netflix, I was a little bit worried. (My second choice, A Snake of June, was also not a film I would call "bad"--I may not be getting into the spirit of sadism when it comes to throwing movies into the hat).
Masamura is one of my favorite directors. When Nagisa Oshima kicked off the Japanese New Wave in the late 1950s by condemning Japanese cinema as "foggy history and flower arrangements," he exempted Masamura. It's easy to see why. Giants and Toys or A Wife Confesses are dramatically different in tone, style, and subject matter than anything you might see from Ozu or Mizoguchi (or even Kurosawa). I can only imagine what Red Angel might have looked like in the hands of Mizoguchi, who had a tendency to go for the tear jerker.
Anyway, a wonderful write-up. Thank you so much!
Post a Comment