Monday, June 13, 2005

HEE-SEOP, CHOI OF FAN'S DESIRING!


There’s a terrific post from Jon Weisman over at Dodger Thoughts today regarding Hee-Seop Choi’s six home runs in the Twins series this past weekend (“Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Choiday, Choiday, Choiday”).

Weisman’s coverage of the Dodgers is always fair, with guarded, fact-based optimism when called for, and equal amounts of frustration based in the same. But ever since Paul DePodesta’s trade that sent Paul Lo Duca and Guillermo Mota to Florida for Brad Penny and Choi, Weisman has stood firm in his belief, against many fans (as well as Jim Tracy at times too, it has seemed) that Choi, who was a quick and convenient whipping boy for the anti-DePodesta crowd when he seemingly underperformed during 62 at-bats last season, would come around if given half a chance to play regularly and gain wisdom under the tutelage of Dodger batting instructor Tim Wallach. Well, this past weekend, the Choi home-run machine just kept churning out the dingers (including a game-winner against former Dodger goat Terry Mulholland), surely providing sweet satisfaction for Weisman and many other Dodger fans, including, I’m sure, those who would prefer not to admit (at least while Choi remains hot) that they were ever naysayers. I particularly liked Jon’s observation regarding the Baseball News Show of Record and their enthusiastic coverage of Choi’s three-homer performance at Dodger Stadium Sunday afternoon:

“My congratulations to ESPN's Baseball Tonight for managing to sneak in its first mention of Choi's three-homer game - no tease, no anything preceding - 19 minutes into their highlight show. Only six minutes after some timely analysis of the fact there are three Molina brothers in the bigs.”

Oh, if Choi were only still a Marlin, or better yet, a Cub. Then baseball journalists could surely then allow themselves to be interested minus the conventional wisdom of disdain and cynicism, and without the fear of suffering embarrassment in front of their colleagues in the press box for doing so. May Choi continue to confound those tireless proponents of team chemistry whose gnashing of teeth last September over the brutal gutting of the Dodgers' heart and soul seemed to drown out all good reason or patience concerning the possibility that the Choi/Penny trade might result in something other than a flaming Dodger meltdown in 2005. We Dodger fans now wait with enthusiasm and anticipation, on this day off, for Choi's first at-bat Tuesday in Kansas City. And Izturis', and Perez's, and Drew's, and Kent's, for that matter. (And for a speedy recovery for Milton Bradley, favored Dodger around my house these days, as well.)

And at least I didn't miss Hee-Seop's heroics this time...

Sunday, June 12, 2005

BEHIND THE SUMMER 2005 MOVIE CURVE PART 1: MY LIFE AT THE MOVIES





Part 1: My Life At The Movies

It figures that the year I finally sit down and begin writing fairly regularly and fairly seriously about movies is also the year in which I will see (at least so far) the fewest new releases, in theaters or on video. Usually, by the start of the summer season I will have taken in anywhere from 20-40 new films, but this year I’ve managed to see precisely 12. Of course, a first half loaded with treats like Sahara, Monster-In-Law, Guess Who, The Interpreter, The Pacifier, Hitch, Beauty Shop, the umpteenth retread of The Amityville Horror and A Lot Like Love (did American moviegoers really demand two Ashton Kutcher movies in the space of as many months?) didn’t exactly inspire me to run out and brave the teeming throng on a Saturday night at the AMC Burbank 16. (Though I did put a minor dent in my Netflix queue and get a lot of writing done!)

Just to give you an idea of my somewhat skewed cinematic priorities these days, the first theatrical release of 2005 that I saw in the theater was the surprisingly watchable Pooh’s Heffalump Movie. That was quickly followed by the dreary clutter, rattle and hum of Robots, and most recently, Madagascar, which turned out to be a lot less shrill and peppered with already tired pop culture references than I expected—truth be told, it was pretty damned clever and enjoyable, though quite run-of-the-mill when measured by the Pixar yardstick. These are the Emma and Nonie Movies, wonderful times I get to spend with my daughters, hopefully introducing them to the joys of going to the movies, even when the movies themselves turn out not to be so wonderful. If I were to make guesses strictly on the basis of the trailers I’ve seen, I’d say that some of the Emma and Nonie Movies to come might just be worth the wait—the advance looks at Valiant, Chicken Little (directed by Mark Dindal, who helmed Warner Animation’s little seen and underrated 1997 feature Cats Don’t Dance and, most tantalizingly, Wallace and Gromit: The Curse of the WereRabbit make me exceedingly glad that I have such convincing and delightful curly-headed excuses to attend these movies.

However, the word from another father I know who got an advance look at Herbie Fully Loaded is that it could be—let’s see, how did he put it? Oh, yes… the worst movie so far this year. This news came just a little too late for me—right after I’d sold Emma and her best friend on attending a screening on opening weekend, two weeks from now, and also after I’d heard that Disney, not wanting to tread too clumsily on the thin cultural ice encrusting George W.’s America, decided it was in their potential audience’s best interests that pulchritudinous teen star Lindsay Lohan’s breasts be digitally reduced in postproduction from a D-cup to a B-cup. Never mind that the Lindsay Lohan in Herbie Fully Loaded barely even resembles the jarringly thin paparazzi bait that has graced all the top tier tabloids of late (and you Maxim readers know that the breasts are the first to go when a well-endowed woman goes on a savage weight-loss campaign). No, Disney’s Victorian response to those test screening scores that registered such dismay over shots of Lohan in a tight, low-cut blouse bending over Herbie’s steaming manifold (Just where did they test this movie anyway? Bob Jones University? Amish Pennsylvania?) has virtually snatched away all tangential interest the movie might hold for devoted fathers who selflessly give up their Saturday afternoons to take their daughters to the movies. But, given the slim gap of years between some of those daughters and Lohan herself, perhaps it’s better that those dads keep their minds out of the gutter anyway.

A look at the other titles that I’ve seen so far in 2005 might, if you were one to hurl about wounding epithets like “nerd,” “geek” or “fanboy,” lead you to conclude that I was some nerdy, geekish fanboy or something when, I swear—I swear nothing could be further from the truth. Okay, I’ll admit I’m a bit of a geek. But if anything, I think the movies on my 2005 list are indicative more of what I’d term my ideal cinema of relaxation than any inherent nerdosity or geekophilia. And if “relaxation” isn’t a word that comes to mind when you hear titles like Sin City, Assault on Precinct 13 or the grueling South Korean revenge drama Oldboy, then maybe you’d prefer I added the word “circus” to my own character description and would care to drop off a couple of live chickens for me to take to the movies next time I go out. I had less affinity for Sin City (I don’t know Frank Miller’s graphic novels) than did several smart people I know, but it never felt like a waste of time, and it was a marked improvement over the execrable one-two DV punch of Spy Kids 3D and Once Upon a Time in Mexico—that said, I think I am about ready to hang up my hat on Robert Rodriguez’s homegrown pulp cool and the violence he revels in that resonates so shallowly for me. Assault on Precinct 13 seemed to me an honorable, well-crafted and drawn-out updating of John Carpenter’s potent “original” (it was actually Rio Bravo crossed with Night of the Living Dead), and the little I asked of it—that it make me care enough about the people inside the precinct house to make me overlook the niggling questions raised by the plot and allow me to get caught up in its genre-specific narrative familiarities— it easily fulfilled. Oldboy, however, is a movie on an entirely different level, an ostensible genre piece that isn’t beholden to oft-played rhythms of American thrillers, a harsh, aching and surprisingly emotional pop fantasia on the inescapable price of revenge, both physical and psychological. Yet it sweeps you up and dashes you about like a good movie should, and never asks you to disregard the nuances of its intellectual elements in order to have a “good time” watching it. I came out of Oldboy feeling splendidly disoriented, like I’d been privy to a world which looked familiar, yet was completely alien; by the end of the movie’s two hours that world had become familiar, and being spat back out onto Fairfax and La Brea at 12:30a.m. after the screening felt like having to reconnect in minutes to a world that seemed suddenly askew, suspicious, terrifying. Now, that’s entertainment!

The missus has been my go-to movie pal for big-budget science fiction so far this year. However, she tends to give a whole lot less quarter when it comes to comic book adaptations or violent alien invasions starring Tom Cruise, so it looks like I’ll be on my own for Batman Begins, War of the Worlds and, if I haven’t been completely polluted by negative advance word by release day, The Fantastic Four. She did accompany me (or, more appropriately, I accompanied her) to the Arclight for Star Wars III: Revenge of the Sith, and I feel pretty good about being able to tell you that, yes, we’re still happily married, and it’s not just for the sake of the children. (She has since seen it again, and by the beard of Obi-wan Kenobi Version 2.0, I’d bet there’s at least one more theatrical screening in it for her before the leaves start to turn.) A much less contentious time was had by both of us when we were able to ditch the girls one afternoon a few weeks ago and head to Westwood (yes, Westwood), where we stopped by Jay and Silent Bob’s Secret Stash comic book store (I scored a really keen old-school Fantastic Four logo T-shirt!) and took in a near last-chance screening of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. I’d read the first book some 20 years ago and loved it, but never made my way into the rest of Douglas Adams’ whimsically absurd universe in any form—book, radio play, or TV special. The missus, however, is a big fan of all of the books. So together we both looked forward to seeing what might come of the big, splashy Disney-financed movie, she with a mite more trepidation than I based entirely on what she felt she had at stake in seeing them pull the unlikely enterprise off properly. We were both pleased, I, predictably, a bit more than she. She termed it as having a 65% success rate at translating the bizarre humor, the seemingly random rhythms and connections of the books, whereas I, if held to a similar rating system, would have upped the percentage to 75. There are stretches when the gulf between the filmmaker’s intent and the flatness of the resulting scenes is indisputable. But I felt the “science” was engaging enough, and Adams’ curly-cue “fictions” were navigated with sufficiently streamlined and enthusiastic accuracy, and augmented by the wittiest, most perversely pleasurable special effects I may have ever seen in a big-budget extravaganza, that I felt the movie stood well on its own as an honorable addition to the Adams legacy.

The remaining four films on my “seen ‘em” list for 2005 fall into two disparate categories, both of which have held enduring fascination for me ever since my formative days as a filmgoer, and both of which now seem to be undergoing somewhat of a renaissance, in quality and even sometimes in relative popularity: the martial arts movie and the documentary. One from each column combine to make up the two best movies of the year that I’ve seen so far—Stephen Chow’s extraordinary Kung Fu Hustle and Thom Andersen’s captivating and challenging Los Angeles Plays Itself.

But each also has a companion piece at spots three and four on my in-progress Best Of 2005 list that has drawn less attention than its ostensible counterpart. Mike Vranovics’ eccentric and darkly humorous account of the frenzy to claim ownership of Barry Bonds’ 73rd home run ball, Up for Grabs, is a terrific examination of the culture of greed surrounding baseball, and by extension all elements of American culture in the 21st century, and I’ll have a lot more to say about it in the coming weeks as part of a long-delayed multi-part article on the Best Baseball Movies Ever (and yes, I think Up for Grabs is good and smart enough to make that list).

And the new Jet Li martial arts thriller Unleashed may just be the best thing on which Luc Besson has ever stamped his name (the French auteur, who co-wrote Li’s mediocre vehicle Kiss of the Dragon, is credited as Unleashed’s screenwriter). The movie is a stunning piece of work, as action cinema, as acting showcase, and as an emotional ambush—I was unprepared for how deep these filmmakers-- director Louis Letterier (co-director, with Cory Yuen, of the Besson-scripted The Transformer), Besson and Li—were willing to go, and in fact would go into the heart of this grim, yet openly sentimental tale of a man trained by a Scottish thug to become a deadly attack dog who discovers a normal life, and the secrets of his past, through his friendship with a blind piano tuner (Morgan Freeman) and his daughter (Kerry Condon). Li has never been better as an actor, and perhaps never better as a pure martial artist, than in this movie. Morgan Freeman is reliably good, in a way understated even for him. But Hoskins is terrific in what could be seen as a quintessential Hoskins role—a roughneck baddie who struts about like a erect penis on two feet, and who manages to deliver dimension to what most actors might have made a simple stock character of unrelentingly evil motivation. Hoskins’ methodlogy of character revelation mirrors the movie’s own surprising depth. And I was totally mesmerized by the work of Kerry Condon, whom I’d never seen on screen before, but with whom I fully intend to familiarize myself now. Condon seems, in Unleashed, a total original, and I could not take my eyes off of her—she does things, again within a character which, in different hands, could have come across as quite the stock concept—that made me grin with happy surprise, laugh out loud and, once or twice, conjure tears. It’s a performance, like Shawnee Smith’s in Saw, that seems so out of the ordinary of its surroundings, so refreshingly imagined and vital to watch, that I hope somehow she bucks the odds and gets remembered at year’s end by critics groups. Of course, the movie was largely ignored, dismissed or attacked by a lot of those same critics as too soft and cuddly—I guess they prefer their action films to be as robotic and unfeeling as Li’s Danny in attack mode, and would rather not confront any messy realities or emotions that might naturally come tied to that action. That this lean, effective, yet expansive movie could be knocked as having a soft underbelly that undermines that effectiveness seems more an indicator of a reviewer’s own desensitization than evidence of Unleashed’s failure to deliver the goods cleanly, with no recognizable aftertaste. If I see a better all-out entertainment aimed for thinking adults than Unleashed, or Kung Fu Hustle, for that matter, this summer, then I’ll know I’ve truly gone to glorious movie heaven instead of the strip-mall chapel of mediocrity to which it appears we moviegoers might be headed this season.

Part 2 of "Behind the Summer 2005 Movie Curve," Coming Attractions, can be found in the post immediately following this one.

BEHIND THE SUMMER 2005 MOVIE CURVE PART 2: COMING ATTRACTIONS




Never Give a Sucker A Even Break: Probably better than anything that'll be released during the summer of 2005

Part 2: Coming Attractions

So, what, then, about what’s coming up? Since it’s clear to me there is virtually no chance that I’ll get to see more than a quarter of the movies on the following lists before year’s end, and that I might be able to catch up to some of them only after they’ve arrived on DVD, I’ve allowed myself a little more indulgence of my preconceived notions than I normally would if I felt I might actually see most or all of the titles in a reasonable period of time. I’ve categorized most of the upcoming summer releases in four slots: MUST SEE, which ought to be fairly self-explanatory; OF INTEREST, which simply means I’d love to see it, but given my newly realistic assessment of how much time I have to devote to seeing films, other titles will likely—though perhaps not absolutely—come first; IN MY QUEUE, meaning that I’ve already pretty much decided that Netflix is going to have to be my avenue for accessing the films in this category; and perhaps the most devilishly fun category to assemble, I DON’T CARE!, in which I allow myself to publicly admit to my absolute disinterest, and sometimes deliberate avoidance, of certain high-profile titles being let loose on the unsuspecting public this summer. Of course, I reserve the right to keep an open mind about any or all the movies in this particular category, because, as any regular filmgoer knows, great movies often sneak up on you when and where you least expect them. I sincerely hope that my worst prejudices will be trumped with high art and/or terrific entertainment by several of the movies in this final section. To the callous and insight-free categorizations, then!

MUST SEE

BATMAN BEGINS I know, I know… bring on the live chickens, circus geek. (June 15)
A LEAGUE OF ORDINARY GENTLEMEN Documentary about one of my favorite things when I was growing up, the Pro Bowlers Tour… What’s holding up those chickens? (Now Playing)
SHAKE HANDS WITH THE DEVIL (The Journey of Romeo Daillaire) Documentary revolving around the UN general, haunted by his inability to prevent the Rwandan genocide, who remains tied to the country of the people he couldn’t help save. (Now Playing)
HOWL’S MOVING CASTLE Alison Veneto talks about the latest from master animator Hayao Miyazaki, as well as High Tension and Night Watch, two other movies found on this massive list, in her International Intrigue column on MoviePoopShoot.com.
WAR OF THE WORLDS I never liked Tom Cruise much, and now that he’s the poster boy for the Let GNC Get You Past Your Post-partum Depression campaign, I have even less respect for him. That said, this movie looks like fun, though being late-period Spielberg I’m not expecting a flawless ride. And to be quite honest, as soon as I heard that the first trailer for Peter Jackson’s King Kong would be attached to this movie, I knew I'd go see Spielberg's contraption. I know, I know… get to biting off those chicken heads! I will, I will! (June 29)
ROCK SCHOOL The trailer for this real-life Jack Black and his School of Rock sold me. You can see it here. (Now Playing)
DEEP BLUE Another gorgeous nature doc from the creators of the BBC series Blue Planet. That kind of imagery on the big screen sounds impossible to resist (Now Playing)
LAND OF THE DEAD I realize this is, in some circles, a heretical comment, but last year’s remake of George Romero’s Dawn of the Dead far outstripped that overrated original work, and the remake, not the two sequels in Romero’s own trilogy, seems to be not only the template for this new chapter (from what I can gauge from the trailer, anyway), but the real standard to which the new movie must live up to. (The original Night of the Living Dead has already proven its unassailable stature in the canon of great horror films by withstanding its own crappy remake as well as nearly 40 years of rip-offs and wanna-bes—it’s still one of the most terrifying of all.) I can’t wait to see how this new chapter stacks up.
ME AND YOU AND EVERYONE I KNOW Entertainment Weekly’s brief synopsis—“Writer/director Miranda July captures the idiosyncrasies of a dysfunctional family in this offbeat dramedy”—makes this sound like every Sundance award-winner you ever wanted to avoid. But advance word from trustworthy sources has been very enthusiastic about this one. (June 24)
THE ISLAND My intense love for the oeuvre of Michael Bay might make the inclusion of this film on my “Must See” category seem a little odd. But I don’t know, Ewan and Scarlet just look so damned sexy with all those vehicles exploding around them and such… (July)
CHARLIE AND THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY I base my interest not on the arch trailer so much as my faith that the Depp/Burton combination, along with an alleged faithfulness to the spirit, if not the letter, of Roald Dahl’s story, might cough up something interesting here. But to those who dismiss the original as being treacly sweet and a betrayal of Dahl’s sensibility, I urge another look. That Gene Wilder musical is a fairly nasty creation in its own right. (July 15)
THE ARISTOCRATS Documentary account of the telling, by a hundred different comedians, of the same filthy joke, is reportedly fall-down hilarious, as well as an vivid portrait of the art of improvisation. (August 5)
THE 40-YEAR-OLD VIRGIN Self-explanatory comedy starring Steve Carell (Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy), written and directed by Judd Apatow (Freaks and Geeks). Good enough for me. (August 19)
GRIZZLY MAN Werner Herzog delivers a documentary, as only he can, about Timothy Treadwell, who spent his life among Alaskan bears, and who was eventually killed by one. (August 5)
BROKEN FLOWERS The third seriocomic showcase for Bill Murray in as many years, this one courtesy of director Jim Jarmusch. (August 5)
UNTITLED MIKE JUDGE COMEDY On the strength of Office Space, I’m willing to give Mike Judge a lot of rope, but this premise sounds irresistible: an “average dumb-ass” (Judge’s description) wakes up 500 years in the future, as part of a military experiment, and discovers that he’s the smartest person alive in a world of the future that has been dumbed-down beyond imagination. (August 5)
ZU WARRIORS Gosh, another lush martial arts spectacular starring Ziyi Zhang? Well, there were those major disappointments, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, Hero and House of Flying Daggers-- maybe they’ll get it right this time? (September)
2046 The long-awaited, long-delayed new film by Wong Kar-wai. (August 5)
LAST DAYS Gus van Sant’s Cannes sensation, shot in the elliptical style of Elephant and the brilliant Gerry, based loosely on the life and death of Kurt Cobain. (July 22)
THE BROTHERS GRIMM Terry Gilliam lends his eye to a fantasia built around the titular fraternal storytellers, played by Heath Ledger and Matt Damon. (July 29)
PULSE More insinuating creepiness from Kiyoshi Kurosawa, director of Cure and Bright Future. (July)


OF INTEREST

HIGH TENSION
NIGHT WATCH
LAYER CAKE
DOUBLE DARE
KINGS AND QUEEN
TROPICAL MALADY
LORDS OF DOGTOWN
HERBIE FULLY LOADED
MARCH OF THE PENGUINS
GENESIS
TONY TAKITANI
THE LAST MOGUL: THE LIFE AND TIMES OF LEW WASSERMAN
DARK WATER
BAD NEWS BEARS
AN UNFINISHED LIFE
HAPPY ENDINGS
9 SONGS
SEARCHING FOR THE WRONG-EYED JESUS
MURDERBALL
FOUR BROTHERS
RED EYE
THE GREAT RAID
SECUESTRO EXPRESS
VALIANT
TOUCH THE SOUND
FANTASTIC FOUR
THE WOODS


IN MY QUEUE

CRASH
DOMINION: PREQUEL TO THE EXORCIST
RIZE
MYSTERIOUS SKIN
SAVING FACE
TELL THEM WHO YOU ARE
MAD HOT BALLROOM
MR. AND MRS. SMITH
CINDERELLA MAN
5x2
MY SUMMER OF LOVE
UNDEAD
HUSTLE & FLOW
THE SKELETON KEY
PRETTY PERSUASION

I DON’T CARE!

KINGDOM OF HEAVEN
It’s the new Ridley Scott movie, but I just don’t care… (That said, I’m scheduled to see it at work this week…)
THE LONGEST YARD
Nothing like an Adam Sandler remake to make the raucous, rough-edged 1974 original look like holy text.
THE HONEYMOONERS
Bancini, a fellow patient on the ward with R.P. McMurphy in the film version of One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest summed it up best when he said, “I’m tired… I’m tired… I’m tired…”
THE PERFECT MAN
This is a Hilary Duff movie. They already suckered me into one teen queen movie this summer by teaming her with a 1968 Volkswagen. Using Heather Locklear in the same fashion is not going to work.
THE SISTERHOOD OF THE TRAVELING PANTS
I admit it—I just don’t think I’m the target demographic here.
THE ADVENTURES OF SHARK BOY AND LAVA GIRL
Leave me alone, Virtuoso Homemade Filmmaker Genius Boy, you bother me!
THE DEAL
A futuristic geopolitical thriller starring Christian… Slater… and…zzzzzz….Selma….Blair—Hunh? Selma Blair? Okay. I’m listening. Oh. Geopolitical thriller with Christian Slater. Wake me when it’s over…zzzzzzzzzz
HEIGHTS
Looks to be a raven-haired, long-locked Glenn Close as a Mrs. Robinson-type in a dysfunctional romantic foursome involving Close’s daughter. I could be wrong, but based on the trailer… I don’t care!
YES
The Los Angeles Times describes it as a movie about an American scientist who “embarks on a passionate affair with a Lebanese cook as a response to her suffocating marriage to an adulterous British politician.” The scientist is played by Joan Allen. The British politician is played by Sam Neill. The cook is played by Simon Akbarian. The film is directed by Sally Potter (Orlando, The Tango Lesson, The Man Who Cried). Heard enough? No? Okay. And the entire movie is performed in iambic pentameter verse.
STEALTH
Another extreme action thriller from the supreme hack Rob Cohen, whose entire output over the past 10 years seems directly attributable to mid-life crisis.
SKY HIGH
Kid has superhero parents, tries to live a “normal” life. From the director of Deuce Bigalow, Male Gigolo, Surviving Christmas and the recently announced update of H.R. Pufnstuf.
REBOUND
Martin Lawrence teaching basketball to wacky group of junior high school kids. You so craaa-a-a-azy!
THE DUKES OF HAZZARD
See entry for The Longest Yard, substitute “Jessica Simpson” or “Seann William Scott” for “Adam Sandler." Consider seppuku before mentioning title of this movie and the phrase “holy text” in same sentence.
THE CAVE
Horror movie starring Cole Hauser. But isn’t any movie starring Cole Hauser a horror movie?
DEUCE BIGALOW, EUROPEAN GIGOLO
Hey, it’s directed by a guy named Mike Bigelow. That means this one’ll probably be pretty good.
BEWITCHED
Does anyone else detect the lingering stench of The Stepford Wives? And the name Nora Ephron attached as director isn’t exactly a can of Glade.
MUST LOVE DOGS
Please, Diane Lane, no more fuzzy romantic comedies! You’re too good to be nuzzling with John Cusack!
WEDDING CRASHERS
Seems no one listened to my impassioned plea for an embargo on any combination of pairings of Owen Wilson, Ben Stiller and Vince Vaughn. Vaughn and Wilson are the stars, and I have no inside information, but would anyone like to wager on the probability of a hilarious cameo appearance by Stiller somewhere in the middle of this thing?

…and last, and almost certainly least, GOING SHOPPING, the latest self-indulgent pile from the supremely narcissistic and solipsistic Henry Jaglom. Is there anyone left who would willingly pay to see a new Henry Jaglom film? I can honestly say I’d rather see a Dukes of Hazzard/Deuce Bigalow, European Gigolo double feature at a drive-in during a massive electrical storm than think one more thought about this or any other film in Jaglom’s oeuvre. But now, as I turn in for the night, my head is going to be filled with all the unleashed memories of all the horrible Jaglom films I’ve seen-- Somebody to Love, Eating, Venice/Venice, Last Summer in the Hamptons and New Year’s Day. Not to mention that smug mug with that ever-present hat. All these things are swirling around in my mind now as I go off to sleep. Thanks a lot, Henry, for your films, for all those indelible images, the warm, probing conversation, and that smug mug and that ever-present hat. Michael Emil never wore a hat. He was proud of his bald head. Thanks a lot, Henry. Thanks a lot.

Thursday, June 09, 2005

CALLING JOE BOB BRIGGS!




The world looks mysterious and wonderful on an overcast, yet not entirely moonless night, at the 99W...

Calling Joe Bob Briggs!

The opening of this drive-in in Columbus, Ohio, looks to give new meaning to the term "passion pit." (Be sure to click on the "complete summer 2005 schedule.")

Thanks, but I'll stick with my memories of Hammer horror double features at the Circle JM Drive-in in Lakeview, Oregon, and the ever-present possibility of making it back up to Newberg, Oregon to visit the good folks at the 99 West Drive-in.

Wednesday, June 08, 2005

THIS WEEK ON KCET'S "INDEPENDENT LENS": CHAVEZ RAVINE: A LOS ANGELES STORY


Andy Torres, baseball writer for the blog Extra Innings on the KPCC 89.3 FM Web site, sent me a heads-up a couple days ago that I'd like to pass along.

Tonight at 9:30 p.m., as part of its Independent Lens series, Los Angeles public television station KCET will air the documentary Chavez Ravine: A Los Angeles Story by filmmaker Jordan Mechner. The film tells the story of 300 families, citizens living in the ravine, who were displaced by the City of Los Angeles with the promise of a low-income housing project from which they would have first pick of the new apartments. But after the land was razed and their homes and schools were destroyed, the people discovered that the land had been sold to Brooklyn Dodgers owner Walter O'Malley to make way for a new ballpark. The previous citizens of Chavez Ravine were never reimbursed for their losses and were forced to find somewhere else to live. The movie, narrated by Cheech Marin, with a music score provided by Ry Cooder and Lalo Guerrero, combines interviews with many former residents of the community, as well as some of the city officials that oversaw the Chavez Ravine project, with archival footage from the era and the photographs of Don Normark, who extensively recorded the life of Chavez Ravine in 1949, having no idea that in just a few years the area would be gone, leaving his striking imagery as one of the final documents of this community.

The film should be of strong interest to Los Angeles area residents interested in their city's tangled political and social history. But fans of the ex-Brooklyn Dodgers should take note as well. Chavez Ravine: A Los Angeles Story promises to tell the painful tale of how a neighborhood and its people were sacrificed to make way for the creation of another place that holds, for Dodger fans, some of the greatest beauty, strongest memories and most vivid associations in all of Los Angeles, as Chavez Ravine undoubtedly did for the people who lived there in 1949, before the Dodgers moved out west.

KCET's Independent Lens series will air Chavez Ravine: A Los Angeles Story tonight, Wednesday, June 8, at 9:30 p.m., and again Saturday, June 11, at 9:00 p.m.

UPDATE: 6/8/05 2:40pm
While I'm at it, I'll give a little plug to another film running on KCET's Independent Lens on Saturday, June 18, at 10:30 p.m. Double Dare is the story of two stuntwomen, one who doubled for Lynda "Wonder Woman" Carter back in the '70s, and another who more recently doubled for Lucy "Xena" Lawless. The word on this documentary is very good. In fact, I strongly recommend bookmarking the Independent Lens Web site and checking in on it regularly. It's an excellent way to keep up on a lot of worthwhile documentary and independent films that may get press, but may also be, for whatever reason, difficult to see in theaters.

Sunday, June 05, 2005

GENE AUTRY'S SUMMER OF SERGIO LEONE





Sergio Leone seemed destined to live a life in the movies. The son of Italian silent film pioneer Vincenzo Leone and actress Bice Waleran, he apprenticed in film production in his late 20s, rising through the ranks until he finally landed some screenwriting work and a series of high-profile second-unit directing jobs on such films as Vittorio de Sica's The Bicycle Thief (1948), Mervyn LeRoy's Quo Vadis? (1951), Fred Zinneman's The Nun's Story (1959) and William Wyler's Ben-Hur (1959). He took over directing the Steve Reeves sword-and-sandal epic The Last Days of Pompei (1959) after original director Mario Bonnard fell ill, though he was left uncredited on the finished film. Dues paid, he finally made his official debut as a director with The Colossus of Rhodes (1960), starring a miscast and uncomfortable-looking Rory Calhoun, and followed with another second unit job on Robert Aldrich's Sodom and Gomorrah.

It might have seemed to the casual observer (and there probably was no other observer of Leone's career in 1962 that could be described as anything other than casual) that he was lining up to become a footnote in film history as a solid, if none-too-distinct director of the kind of biblical/historical epics that had already peaked in popularity. Those epics would give way, as would big-budget formula pictures such as the musical and, significantly, the western, to the influences of the French new wave that would help to virtually dismantle the Hollywood studio system and produce audacious, revolutionary and reflective films like Bonnie and Clyde and The Wild Bunch. But instead of shuffling off into a career of comfortable craftsmanship and relative obscurity, Leone decided that, for his sophomore directorial effort, he would see if anyone noticed while he shamelessly ripped off Akira Kurosawa and his 1961 film Yojimbo (whose own roots were tangled up with Dashiell Hammett’s Red Harvest and perhaps even an 18th-century farce entitled A Servant and Two Masters by Carlo Goldoni).




Leone imagined casting Henry Fonda, James Coburn (who once claimed Leone’s script was the worst he’d ever read), Coburn’s Magnificent Seven and Great Escape costar Charles Bronson, and even Calhoun, in the lead role of a drifter gunman, never identified by name, who plays two warring families against each other in a dusty town located near the Texas-Mexican border. But none of the Hollywood veterans were either available or could be convinced to come to Italy for what Leone was willing to pay. Instead, Leone reluctantly hired a TV cowboy named Clint Eastwood, who was on vacation from his American series Rawhide and who figured that, though making the movie was a good way to spend his off time learning about filmmaking, no one would ever see it. The movie was not the first instance of what would come to be known as the spaghetti western, but Leone’s Yojimbo riff, titled A Fistful of Dollars (1964), was the first of the Italian westerns to become an international hit.

Dollars wasn't released in the United States until 1967. In the meantime, Leone had coaxed Eastwood back for a sequel, For a Few Dollars More (1965), and the capper of what would become known as the Dollars Trilogy, The Good, the Bad and the Ugly (1966). When the first two Dollars films became unqualified hits in the States, The Good, the Bad and the Ugly was already waiting in the wings, and by the time it finally saw the light of American projectors in 1968, the Eastwood/Leone phenomenon was at full throttle.




These violent, amoral fables were spun from the contrast between Leone’s operatic, mercilessly astringent, self-conscious style and the morally ambiguous calm of Eastwood’s Man with No Name, who erupts into unexpected action as suddenly as Leone might swing the visual pendulum from a deep-focus long view of a stark, empty plain to a startling, Techniscope frame-filling close-up of a glowering, weather-beaten thug in the same shot. And their caustic reconsideration and recasting of the myths and behavioral codes of the Western coincided with the fast fading at the box office of that most American of film genres in the very country of its origin, as well as the reconsideration of many societal roles and assumptions by the younger generation that was just coming of age and becoming aware of the artistic possibilities of film.

During this period (1962-1974), the films of Sam Peckinpah (Ride the High Country, Major Dundee, The Wild Bunch, The Ballad of Cable Hogue and Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid) and Robert Aldrich (Ulzana’s Raid) were probably the most telling of the American westerns, in terms of the tension between the times they depicted, the times in which they were made (and how the tensions of those differing times frequently overlapped), as well as their directors’ fevered ambitions and demons as artists. But the Italian Leone brought a revisionist daydreamer's sense of spectacle, and a delirium-spiked nihilism, to his westerns that was far more harsh and critical of American mythology than even Peckinpah at his most agonized and circumspect (The Wild Bunch) or Aldrich at his most bitter (Ulzana’s Raid). By the time he attempted to sum up his contrasting, all-consuming feelings about the form in Once Upon a Time in the West (1969), he had added a cold-eyed, ambivalent romanticism about the creation of the American West, borne of his rampant movie love, to the harsh worldview of the Dollars films, which served to enrich and expand his otherwise withering critiques of capitalist institutions of power, human nature and the bitter price of revenge.




Once Upon a Time in the West, though now considered one of the great westerns, was initially mishandled by its distributor, Paramount Pictures, and didn’t go down well with the audiences that did buy tickets. Most preferred soft and cuddly (Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid) or grizzled and apocalyptic (The Wild Bunch) visions of the passing of the West to Leone’s fever-dream reimagining of its genesis, or to simply precipitate the passing of the western itself by ignoring most remaining examples of them altogether. The director’s last stab at the genre (or at least the general historical period) was the raucous Duck, You Sucker (1971), starring Rod Steiger and James Coburn and set during the Mexican revolution (its original title, abandoned by Leone, was to be Once Upon a Time… The Revolution). Retitled A Fistful of Dynamite by United Artists (for plainly obvious reasons) and cut by over a half-hour, it was released into this none-too-favorable marketplace where, despite its humor and the scale of its spectacular action sequences, it made practically no impression at all.

For reasons better described in Sir Christopher Frayling’s exhaustive biography Sergio Leone: Something to Do With Death, Leone then began a long hiatus, reportedly even turning down an offer to direct The Godfather. For most of the 1970s he primarily produced and lent his name to a series of features, two of which—1973’s My Name is Nobody and 1975’s A Genius, Two Friends and an Idiot (also known in America as Trinity is Back Again, though it was not actually one of the popular Trinity comedy-westerns starring Terence Hill and Bud Spencer)-- he reportedly partially directed himself.




But in the early 1980s he reemerged with his magnificent gangster saga Once Upon a Time in America, centered upon the opium-fueled, temporally free-associative dream logic of an aging Jewish gangster contemplating the trajectory of his life and that of his childhood friends, and their place in the country in which that life of crime and betrayal once flourished and then played itself out. America was a sprawling, lyrical, lovely and brutal beast of a film, incorporating many of the stylistic tropes and thematic lines that Leone had developed over his long, and relatively unprolific, career, and it was misunderstood and butchered upon its American release—not only was the nearly four-hour film cut by nearly 90 minutes by the Ladd Company, but its radically restructured chronology was flattened out and given an ostensibly linear construct, which had the ironic effect of rendering Leone’s intricately linked story nonsensical. Pauline Kael, comparing the theatrical and restored cuts, wrote that the hacked-up version “seemed so incoherently bad that I didn’t see how the full-length film could be anything but longer,” and when she saw that full-length cut she proclaimed amazement at the difference—“I don’t believe I’ve ever seen a worse case of mutilation.”

The original cut of Once Upon a Time in America was eventually restored and shown at the New York Film Festival, and it seemed that the second act of Leone’s career as a masterful film director was about to get underway. However, in 1989, while preparing another epic, a Soviet co-production about the siege of Leningrad in World War II, Leone died unexpectedly. Largely on the strength of five major films, Leone left behind a cinematic legacy as distinctive and influential as any director in the history of cinema. And this summer the Gene Autry Museum of the American West in Griffith Park is highlighting that legacy with a film series and an exhibition entitled Once Upon a Time in Italy: The Westerns of Sergio Leone.




Cocurators Estella Chung, Autry Museum Associate Curator of Popular Culture, and Leone biographer and scholar Sir Christopher Frayling, have assembled an exhibit, which will run from July 30, 2005 to January 22, 2006, that will feature original costumes and props, set designs by production designer Carlo Simi, rare Italian and international movie posters, and original documentaries detailing Leone’s career, his passion for the Hollywood visions that informed and propelled his own imagination, and the degree to which the influence of that imagination extends throughout international cinema to this day. The exhibit promises to provide visitors with a rare and substantive collection of information and study of Sergio Leone’s life, technique and career development as a major director of cinema, as well as yet another reason for Los Angeles residents, film buffs as well as those interested in the multifaceted history of the American West, to hail and be thankful for the continued existence and prosperity of the Gene Autry Museum. For those fans of Leone’s cinema who might be reading this in other cities or countries, if you have the means (I’ve no doubt you have the desire), this might just be the ideal excuse around which to plan that vacation to Los Angeles you’ve been putting off.

Tantalizingly, the spectacular promise of the exhibit itself is just the beginning of what the Autry has in store for buffs during this Summer of Sergio. In conjunction with the Autry Museum’s presentation, the Alex Film Society will be screening the restored three-hour Italian version of The Good, the Bad and the Ugly (with added scenes dubbed in English by Clint Eastwood and Eli Wallach) at the beautiful Glendale movie palace, the Alex, on July 23 at 7:00 p.m. (The Society’s Web site offers the conflicting information that the restored print being shown runs the length of the American release version— 161 minutes— but information available at the theatre itself confirms the 180-minute running time.) The screening will be preceded by a live performance from musician Alessandro Alessandroni, “the Whistler,” who recorded on Leone’s original soundtracks, as well as an introduction by Autry exhibit cocurator Sir Christopher Frayling, Rector at the Royal College of Art in London, chair of the Arts Council England, and author of Sergio Leone: Something to Do With Death, who will speak about Leone's films and his legacy. Of course, in the age of DVD and the home theater revolution, any opportunity to see The Good, the Bad and the Ugly on the big screen should be seized upon, and if you’re never seen a movie, classic or otherwise, at the Alex, I can’t imagine a better introduction to this spectacular showcase. If you are already familiar with the luxurious splendor of the Alex, no further prompting should be necessary. General admission tickets are $13.50, $9.50 for kids 12 and under, seniors 65 and older or groups of 10 or more, and $7 for Alex Film Society members, and are available daily at the Alex box office or by clicking here.




But, as they used to say on those late-night Ronco TV commercials, that’s not all. There will also be one-night only screenings of Once Upon a Time in the West (Wednesday, July 27, 8:00 pm.) and Once Upon a Time in America (Thursday, July 28, 8:00 p.m.) at the Arclight Cinemas in Hollywood. You can click here or here for further information on these screenings, though as of this writing (Sunday, June 5) none seems to have yet been posted. If you’re interested in either of these screenings (and you should be), keep checking and get your tickets as early as possible, because these special screenings at the Arclight tend to sell out fast, like hot rock concerts. And in case you missed them earlier in the week at the Alex, Mssrs. Alessandroni and Frayling will be at the Autry’s Wells Fargo Theater on Saturday, July 30 at 2:00 p.m. to introduce, in their own ways, a screening of A Fistful of Dollars. Admission is $10, $5 for Autry National Center members, and are available by clicking here.




But that’s not all! If you’re looking for entertainment under the stars, Ennio Morricone’s scores from the Leone films, plus other highlights of Italian movie music, can be heard at the Hollywood Bowl on Friday and Saturday evenings, August 26 and 27. Tickets for “La Dolce Vita: Italian Cool on a Hot Summer Night” can be purchased here or by calling 323-850-2000. And that same Saturday night, August 27, the Autry turns their south wall into an outdoor movie theater for four consecutive weeks of Leone classic westerns. You can bring blankets, chairs, food and friends, and every screening is free and open to the public. Show time is 8:00 p.m. The schedule:

Saturday, August 27: A Fistful of Dollars
Saturday, September 3: For a Few Dollars More
Saturday, September 10: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Saturday, September 17: Once Upon a Time in the West

Finally, Sir Christopher Frayling will have a new book available as an accompaniment to the exhibition, Once Upon a Time in Italy: The Westerns of Sergio Leone, that promises to be an invaluable addition to his Leone biography, Something to Do With Death and his earlier volume entitled Spaghetti Westerns. The new book is available now on a pre-order basis by clicking here .

If you’re a fan of Leone’s films, a connoisseur, devotee, appreciator, or whatever terminology you might favor, the announcement of this exhibit and screenings is true cause for celebration. The easy access to all these films on DVD is a wonderful thing in itself, but should in no way deter you from seeing them as big and wide and spectacular as they were meant to be seen (Pauline Kael once said of Leone that there wasn’t a dingy main street in any of the beat-up towns in any of his movies that didn’t seem half a mile wide from boardwalk to boardwalk). And to have available all the props, information, memorabilia and scholarship on Leone that the Autry Museum is going to be making available this summer seems to me like the best, most unexpected gift. I hope to take in as many of the screenings and as much of the museum’s other offerings as I can, and I hope you will too.

(If you're interested in more detailed biography of Leone than the one provided here, and have not yet gotten to Frayling's, there's a fine piece on the director written by Daniel Edwards that you can read here on the excellent film site Senses of Cinema.)

Thursday, June 02, 2005

WHERE IS THE LOVE FOR LITTLE CESAR?




Turns a double play slicker'n Edward G. Robinson, that's for sure...

It’s Thursday night, and the Dodgers just beat the Brewers 6-4. Eric Gagne closed it out, although he took his time, and J.D Drew had two homers, the second with a man aboard. So maybe the Dodgers will start to pick it up a bit. I was at the Ravine last night, and despite the fact that it was just about as perfect a night for baseball as could be, and despite the fact that watching the game was a whole lot of fun regardless of the final score (I was there with my father-in-law, along with a couple of buddies, for his 83rd birthday), the Cubs completed a three-game sweep of the Dodgers and reduced them, for at least 24 hours, to a .500 ball club. The Dodgers have some heavy lifting ahead of them if they’re to pull themselves off the mat and make up six games on the surprisingly resilient, division-leading Padres, and they need to take advantage of the opportunities to do so. The Padres lost last night, and so did the entire NL West. But tonight, the Cubs continued their whipping ways in San Diego, and the Dodgers put together some offense against another third-place team—exactly what they need to be doing when they have the chance. So all hope is not lost. It’s just that third place is not exactly where I, or the Dodgers, I’m sure, thought they’d be on June 2 after that 12-2 start.

But now that I’ve come to terms with The Way It Is Right Now, I just want to talk for a second about our mighty shortstop. Last night was Cesar Izturis Bobblehead Night, and some 54,000 fans glided through the turnstiles to greedily gobble up their souvenirs. The throng were completely overjoyed at their toys, and each time Izturis’ name was mentioned, each time he came up to bat (he went 2-4 with two hits, a run scored and a walk), they cheered with what sounded like genuine emotion.




And yet, these same fans, who are so in love with their Gold Glove shortstop that they hustled their asses out to a baseball game on a Wednesday night (imagine!) to take home a bobblehead likeness of the man that actually more resembles Manny Mota than Little Cesar, have refrained in mass quantities from casting their ballots for him in the All-Star voting. As it stands right now, Cesar Izturis, widely acknowledged as arguably the best active shortstop in the game, outside of perhaps Derek Jeter, is not even in the top five in votes counted.

So who is? Let’s see: a hobbled ex-Red Sox who sat out two months of 2004 on the D.L. before coming back and making no appreciable difference in the Cubs’ failure to make the postseason, and who has played exactly 14 games for them this year so far before going back on the D.L.; a scrappy ex-Angel with little speed, but with all the right attitude and talent that makes him impossible to dislike or to discount; a laser-throwing Brave with a .229 batting average, a .281 OBP and a criminal record for multiple DUIs; a likable Met with speed on the base pads and 63 hits so far in 2005; and, if all continues to go well, the probable National League Rookie of the Year winner for the cellar-dwelling Colorado Rockies.

Okay, Reyes and Eckstein have made good cases for themselves on the field, and their fans have responded accordingly, and Barmes has a lot of good buzz which, again, is being added to through the enthusiasm of those willing to pick up a ballot and punch out a chad in his honor. And Furcal, a good player (not, I think, a great player) is probably in there largely because he’s a name familiar to “fans” other than those of the Tomahawk-chopping variety (thanks, TBS).

But what the hell is this business of Nomar Garciaparra leading the voting? Are heartbroken Red Sox fans still pining for him to the degree that they’ll check off a vote next to his name simply because of that enduring love? Of course, because he’s not in the American League anymore, they can vote for him and Edgar Renteria with a clear conscience. But why the hell would a Cubs fan vote for him? What has he done for them lately besides illustrate in horrific detail exactly what they don’t want to have happen to their own precious groins? What has he ever done for them as a Cub? And yet there he is, high atop the standings in the current voting, not because he’s the best shortstop in the National League in 2005, but simply because he’s No-o-o-maaaaaaah.

Cesar Izturis, all he’s doing is standing in 4th place in the National League in batting average as a .339 switch-hitter (.358/.839 from the left, .340/.808 from the right) with a hit total (77) that ties him with Brady Clark of the Brewers for best not only in the National League, but in the entire league! Yet your average bobblehead-clutching Dodger fan doesn’t seem to care to show Izturis the kind of respect that could make him the first Dodger to be voted into the All-Star starting lineup since Mike Piazza in 1997 (that honor is likely to go to Jeff Kent). If you are reading this and you are a Dodger fan, please consider visiting the Los Angeles Dodgers Web site, or MLB.com, and taking the time to cast a vote toward righting this egregious and distressing oversight. And if you’re not a Dodger fan but can look at the reality of Izturis’ performance and recognize what he’s doing on this team this year, maybe you could find it in your heart to cast a vote for him too. The guy is a gamer, a brilliant shortstop, and he’s elevated his hitting to a height which few thought he would ever ascend while watching him just a couple of years ago. He matches Milton Bradley’s fire, Jeff Kent’s cool consistency and Eric Gagne’s lust for competition with a quiet intensity all his own, the hallmark of a truly terrific baseball player. Dodger fan, kindly put down your beach ball, shut off your cell phone, get up off your bobblehead, pay attention to the game and, while you’re at it, show Little Cesar some love and respect. Send him to Detroit in July.