Saturday, September 17, 2005

2046 plus ALMOST 2046 MOVIES COMING SOON and other thoughts for the weekend

2046I’m not sure I understand those writers who have suggested that experience with In the Mood for Love isn’t absolutely necessary to follow or enjoy Wong Kar-wai’s follow-up film, 2046, which shares a main character with Love and references, explicitly and obliquely, events and near-events that were the meat of the previous film. My feeling is that what’s being suggested is, seeing 2046 as merely a kaleidoscope of beautiful imagery or a cinematic parade of stunning women is good enough, because otherwise concentrating on the movie’s “plot” would be too headache-inducing. And my guess is, it’s the writers who feel this way who missed In the Mood for Love, and advocating 2046 as merely a gorgeous visual bliss-out, deemphasizing its content, is their way of saying they didn’t “get” the new film without actually saying as much. It all sounds curiously like the cynical marketing of 2001: A Space Odyssey as a head trip to a potential audience whose brainpans were already too befuddled to engage Kubrick’s film on its own terms-- it was made acceptable to account for it simply as a series of pretty pictures, and MGM cleaned up when it re-released the film.

I saw 2046 last night with a friend who had not seen In the Mood for Love, and he admitted quite a bit of difficulty being able to follow the film on its emotional level— he couldn’t figure out, for example, why Chow (Tony Leung Chiu Wai) was so indifferent to Bai Ling (Ziyi Zhang) until the film’s conclusion, at which point the movie’s chance of coalescing for him as a narrative was fairly well muted. (The underlying subtext of his response was, of course, why would anyone dump Ziyi Zhang? What, is this Chow fella crazy or something?) But if you’re able to reference the film’s many allusions to Love and plug them into what Wong has constructed here—a fictional, futuristic world inside the mind of a writer, living in “the present” (sometime after the 1968 conclusion of Love but before the year 2046) who is also constantly projecting backward to his great lost love, the non-affair affair with Su Li Zhen (Maggie Chung Man Yuk) in the previous film, who shows up here in three separate incarnations (played by two different female icons of Chinese cinema)—you’ll have plenty of grist for the intellectual mill to go along with the ravishment of your senses. That past sentence alone hopefully suggests the folding in on themselves that makes 2046 and In the Mood for Love seem like one film instead of two, and certainly far more than empty exercises in set design, mind-boggling cinematography, or obsessive cataloguing of great beauties in a seemingly never-ending series of gorgeous, form-fitting dresses* and retro-hip bouffant hairdos. Wong is after how the mind wrestles with romantic obsession, how the workings and responsibilities and realities of love contrast with simple romantic attachment, and where (2046—a room, a state of mind, a place far in the future from which no one, naturally, has ever returned?) that obsession might lead. The director’s elliptical poetry and teasingly erotic visual grammar get us there in 2046, a movie which seemed, to this eye, to have almost no narrative peaks while I was watching it. I found Wong and cinematographer Christopher Doyle’s imagery so fundamentally transfixing that I was satisfied with the movie’s lulling rhythms, and the intertwining connections and dangling questions my mind was so involved in decoding. Yet upon reflection (and revisiting the trailer this afternoon), the movie has only gained in vitality, and its visual world-- not nearly so urban city futuristic as it is a somewhat claustrophobic interior landscape glowing with desire and regret-- seems so irresistibly seductive and exciting that I can’t wait to immerse myself in it again.

* UPDATE 9/18/05 11:54 pm: They're called cheongsams. Aren't they lovely?


I don’t know whether I just haven’t been paying as close attention as I should, but it seems like there’s an awful lot of worthwhile DVDs coming our way in the next month or so that would make either great additions to a collector’s library or to one’s Netflix queue. My thanks to Jim Knipfel of the New York Press and the good folks at Film Comment-- the “Home Movies” section, which tantalizingly concludes each issue of the magazine—they were the sources of information on the titles you’ll see listed below. All of these films are interesting and, it seems to me, worth pursuing—some I have seen and loved, some I have seen and not loved, some I have not seen and hope to encounter very soon. Some are already available for you to see, but most are Coming Soon To A Home Theater Near You. I hope you find something on this list worth checking out too. If not, well, there’s always the New Releases shelf at your local Franchise-O-Rama video store…

An Angel at My Table Jane Campion, Criterion (9/20) *
Anna Christie Clarence Brown, Warner (available now) **
Anna Karenina Clarence Brown, Warner (available now) **
Bad Timing: A Sensual Obsession Nicolas Roeg, Criterion (9/27) *
Billion Dollar Brain Ken Russell, Columbia/TriStar (10/4)
Blood for Dracula (aka Andy Warhol’s Dracula) Paul Morrissey, Image (9/20)
Boudu Saved From Drowning Jean Renoir, Criterion (available now)
Camille George Cukor, Warner (available now) **
Cat People/Curse of the Cat People (Double Feature) Jacques Tourneur, Robert Wise/Gunther von Fritsch, Warner (10/6) ***
The Chronicle of Anna Magdalena Bach Jean-Marie Straub, Daniele Huillet, New Yorker (10/4)
Cop James B. Harris, MGM/UA (10/4)
Demon Seed Donald Cammell, Warner (10/4)
Die, Monster, Die!/The Dunwich Horror (Double Feature) Daniel Haller, MGM Midnite Movies (9/20)
Flesh and the Devil Clarence Brown, Warner (available now) **
Flesh for Frankenstein (aka Andy Warhol’s Frankenstein) Paul Morrissey, Image (9/20)
The Flowers of St. Francis Roberto Rossellini, Criterion (available now)
The Ghost Ship Mark Robson, Warner (10/6) ****
Grand Hotel Edmund Goulding, Warner (available now) **
Hammer Horror Series (Two-Disc Set) includes Brides of Dracula, Curse of the Werewolf, The Phantom of the Opera (Terence Fisher), Night Creatures aka Captain Clegg (Peter Graham Scott), Kiss of the Vampire (Don Sharp), Paranoiac, Nightmare aka Here’s the Knife, Dear—Now Use It, The Evil of Frankenstein (Freddie Francis) Universal (available now)
The Innocents Jack Clayton, Fox (available now) *
In the Year Of the Pig Emile de Antonio, Home Vision (9/20) *
Isle of the Dead/Bedlam (Double Feature) Mark Robson, Warner (10/6) ***
I Walked With a Zombie/The Body Snatcher (Double Feature) Jacques Tourneur, Robert Wise, Warner (10/6) ***
The Leopard Man Jacques Tourneur, Warner (10/6) ****
Major Dundee (Extended Version) Sam Peckinpah, Sony (9/20)
The Miracle of Morgan’s Creek Preston Sturges, Paramount (now available)
The Man Who Fell to Earth Nicolas Roeg, Criterion (9/27)
Masculin Feminin Jean-Luc Godard, Criterion (9/20)
Mata Hari George Fitzmaurice, Warner (available now) **
The Mysterious Lady Fred Niblo, Warner (available now) **
Naked Mike Leigh, Criterion (9/20) *
Ninotchka Ernst Lubitsch, Warner (available now) **
Oldboy Chan-wook Park, TLA (available now)
Point of Order Emile de Antonio (release date TBA)
Queen Christina Rouben Mamoulian, Warner (available now) **
Le Samourai Jean-Pierre Melville, Criterion (10/18)
Save the Green Planet! Jun-hwan Jeong, Koch (available now)
The Seventh Victim Mark Robson, Warner (10/6) ****
The Stationmaster’s Wife Rainer Werner Fassbinder (release date TBA)
The Temptress Fred Niblo, Mauritz Stiller, Warner (available now) **

* When you rent this one, please feel free to check out the excellent closed-captioning and/or SDH subtitles, courtesy of Thom MacGregor and/or myself

** Available separately or together in the Warner Garbo: Signature Collection box—check CostCo for a potentially great deal on this if you’re buying; I picked the Warner Film Noir and Gangsters box sets there for about $20-30 cheaper than the list price of each

*** Available separately or together in the Warner Val Lewton Horror Collection box—see above for CostCo buying advice

**** Available only as part of the Warner Val Lewton Horror Collection box


I’m leading a caravan of friends and coworkers to the Mission Tiki tonight, just part of the grand plan to get the word out about this great drive-in and others in the area that are still going strong. We’re bringing our folding chairs and settling in early (manager Jeff Thurman is kindly letting us in before the box office officially opens so we can get a good spot) for a double feature of The 40-Year-Old Virgin and The Skeleton Key. If all goes well, this might become a regular get-together for the folks at my office—we’ve already tentatively planned another outing in October so that those who weren’t able to do this one can get in on the fun.

The Southern California Drive-In Movie Society is going great guns too. We’re scheduled to meet next Saturday, September 24, at the Vineland Drive-In in City of Industry. If you’d like to stop by and chat or fill out a registration form to join the club on your way through the snack bar, we’ll be set up in the snack bar through the first feature. On October 29 the club will be back at the Mission Tiki, and rumor has it there might even be a little TV coverage to welcome us and help get the word spread even further. More on that as Halloween weekend gets closer.

Bob Golding, owner of the Marysville Drive-In in Marysville, Central California, passed away unexpectedly this past Tuesday, September 13. A report in the Marysville-Yuba City Appeal-Democrat said that Golding’s death was ruled accidental and that his family will be attempting to carry on with the theater, despite numerous reports over the summer that the drive-in was facing imminent closure. We members of the Southern California Drive-In Movie Society extend our condolences and best wishes to the Golding family as they endeavor to hold Bob’s spirit close to their own and keep the gates of the Marysville Drive-In open, just as he was dedicated to doing up to the day he died.


Last but not least, I finally got going on the answers round-up post for Professor Wagstaff’s Summer of 42 (Questions, That Is) Wednesday night. Unfortunately, it took me three hours just to compile the notes! By the time I finished doing that I was delirious. But everything is gathered together, and if it hadn’t been for Wong Kar-wai I probably would have gotten at least a start on the big Wagstaff follow-up. But you got this instead. (Do you feel lucky… punk?) The good news is, in going over these answers again, I was really happy to be reminded just how hilarious some of them were, and how very entertaining and fascinating almost all of them were. We got some new blood involved in the contest this time around, which is always nice, but the veterans came through as well. And just a heads-up, students—the faculty is gathering up steam for a Christmas holiday season quiz to keep you occupied whilst you sit beneath the tree and gather dry pine needles upon your scalp, so be prepared. Golly, what balls! Terrifying the natives with the specter of a new quiz when the good professor hasn’t even returned the term papers on this one yet! But don’t worry—I’m pretty sure I’ll fry for it someday. Until then, time for some sleep. Must be awake and lucid at the drive-in, you know.


Anonymous said...

I'm not sure I can get a grip on all this "2046" stuff, much less watch the other film before I see it--but if it's got Ziyi Zhang, I'll make an effort. (I'll bet she's really mean in real life. Really, she must have some kind of flaw). As for the long list of recommended DVD sets, I can only drool and wish I could watch some of them! And finally, bring on Prof. Wagstaff! I somehow make time for his demanding quizzes.

Dennis Cozzalio said...

I found the Hammer Horror Series box this weekend for an obscenely low $19.99-- that's less than $2.25 per movie! I suspect we might be spinning one of those platters come Halloween weekend! And sorry if all I ended up doing is make 2046 sound confusing-- I think my enthusiasm for the romantic fatalism of themovie, and for the jumbled sense of perspective it created in me while watching it, may have gotten the best of me here. But it really is a great movie-- perhaps of the best of 2005 so far. As for the Professor, I truly do intend to get those answers posted this week, as there were so many great ones and it's fun to read them in a little-bit-easier-to-read format-- all the while writing down good questions for the professor big Christmas quiz!

Anonymous said...

Suggested quiz question: Favorite "Romantic Fatalism" movie....? (Besides 2046 and In the Mood for Love which are not allowed.) I also suggest you limit the quiz to 10 questions! Less questions will get you more respondents and each of our answers could be more detailed, thus yielding more potential comedy gold. Please!! You'll just get one-word answers if you go too far!

I love the Home Movies back pages of Film Comment. It makes me drool over the upcoming DVD releases. It's very well organized and filtered so only the best stuff is brought to your attention and stuff you might not have known about.

(Although DVD Beaver's release calendar is also decent and drool-inducing.)

Maybe you could scan and post all those past "Home Movies" sections in an easy-to-peruse format going back as far as you've got copies! (Or set up a side site of them.) I ask because I don't pick Film Comment up anymore, but I'd still like that as a reference. It was a great source for finding good movies to watch, and I don't think they post it on their Web site, even though they post some of the articles.

- The Mysterious (Ad(ri)an bEt(a=max;