Sunday, June 02, 2024

MR. JIM McALLISTER’S POLITICALLY SIGNIFICANT, ETHICALLY QUESTIONABLE, ANTI-HISTORY- REPEATING-ITSELF SPRING TERM MOVIE QUIZ



Well, it’s been a while, hasn’t it, students? About two-and-a-half years, to be exact, since any missive at all from the SLIFR campus, and even further back than that—sometime in the first couple of months of 2020, when COVID was tightening its grip on the world—for the last SLIFR Movie Quiz. Over the past two and a half years I just kind of assumed that the doors of this musty old institution had been shut forever, and who knows—maybe they should be. But I’ve been missing it just a bit—Facebook has pretty much eclipsed the relevance of the blog and the blogosphere, as we who were cranking posts out almost daily in the early 2000s used to call it, and it’ll never be the same as it was, in terms of finding new voices and connecting to them and passing them on to others. But, to co-opt an even mustier banner, SLIFR will always be my space, and it’s nice to know I can return to it whenever I decide the time is right. And I guess that time is now.

 I don’t know how consistently I’ll be contributing in 2024 and beyond, but you know, when I started Sergio Leone and the Infield Fly Rule back in November 2004 there was never a plan, and I certainly never expected to be hard at it for 17 years. I never wrote for anybody but myself anyway, and I certainly never expected, given my track record with long-term commitment to any project, that I’d last much more than a few months before I lost interest or just wore myself out. So I was just lucky that I managed to linger for a while longer than that and drag a whole bunch of others, most of them smarter than me by a country mile, along for the ride. Now I’m back, and I have questions.

Or more accurately, Dr. Jim McAllister, head of the History department at SLIFR University, has questions. As a faculty member with his own track record of ethical challenge in the arena of rigging outcomes (he did not Pick Flick), we felt it would be a perfect time for him to step in and massage the SLIFR student body  with some pleasurable brain-tingling as a prelude to what promises to be a conversely mind-numbing election season, during which there will undoubtedly be more than enough pompous blather about rigged contests and threats to our constitution (from them, of course, never from us). Stimulation, says McAllister, is better than depression, and we couldn’t agree more. So in that spirit we are proud to present something less despairing to think about as the six months leading up to November begin to dawn: Mr. Jim McAllister’s Politically Significant, Ethically Questionable, Anti-History-Repeating-Itself Spring Term Movie Quiz.

The rules are the same as always—just copy and paste the questions into the comments column (either here or, since this is 2024 and not 2004, on Facebook) and let the answers come naturally. There is no wrong answer, and the more elaborate that answer is, the better. And this time, Mr. McAllister has allowed me to go first, because he feels sure that if I wait to post my answers for another week or two that I’ll get mired into some other responsibilities and end up not offering my completed quiz until August. And his fears are well founded—he knows me better than I’d like to admit.

Okay, get your #2s ready. It’s time to open your Blue Books, knuckle down and get to writing. After a near-four-year hiatus, let the latest SLIFR Movie Quiz begin!

**************************

1) Movie that best reflects, describes or embodies the tenor of our times  I won’t be surprised if titles like All the King’s Men and A Face in the Crowd make a strong showing here, but for me, just as it was in 1975, just as it was in 2016, no movie better reflects, describes or embodies the fucked-up strange brew of corruption, racism, malfeasance, boorish sexism, general upending of decorum and tradition—yes, what used to be called a weird sort of effervescent American spirit-- that has marked political discourse in this country for at least the last 60 years than Robert Altman’s Nashville.


2) Favorite Don Siegel movie not starring Clint Eastwood With all due respect to Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956), it’s gotta be Charley Varrick (1973)--  Siegel’s original Invasion runs a very close second.

3) Your favorite movie theater, now or then I’ve been to many theaters since I started going to them in 1963, many of them some of the most beautiful movie palaces I’ve ever seen, some of them rundown cineplexes, and most of them with top-notch projection and sound. At least compared to the theater I absolutely must pick, the theater where I grew up with the movies, learn to love them, argue with them, absorb them, the theater from where all the cinephilia that has so marked my life originally sprang. It’s being slowly, loving restored for a community that is enthralled by the process but may not, once that restoration is finished, may not know how to properly honor it, and it has now, thanks to those restoration efforts, been recognized in the National Register of Historic Places. It’s been in my hometown since 1940, and it’s been in my life since 1963. It’s the Alger Theater in downtown Lakeview, Oregon. It’ll never be the best theater in the world, but it’s definitely the best theater in town, and it’s looking better than ever. And I’m so glad it was there for me when I needed it.



4) You’re booking this Friday and Saturday night at that theater—What are the double features for each night? I think it’d have to be a double feature of Frankenstein Must Be Destroyed (1969) and Tales from the Crypt (1972) to mark the formative experience I had as a young horror fan seeing both of these movies for the first time at the Alger.


5) Wendy Hiller or Deborah Kerr? In a not-exactly-grudge match between two Powell/Pressburger heavyweights, you might think that Kerr would be the easy winner here on the strength of her strong showing in two indisputable P&P classics, The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp (1943) and Black Narcissus (1947). But purely based on the fact that I recently saw it again, and as it always does it made me swoon like a schoolgirl in full blush, I’m handing this one over to Wendy Hiller and her magnificent turn as a fiancée thwarted by forces of nature (the weather and Roger Livesey) in her attempts to cross a Scottish channel and reunite with her betrothed in I Know Where I’m Going! (1945). Raise your eyebrows if you must, but given that my first exposure to Hiller was in Murder on the Orient Express (1974), where she was anything but sensuous, I think she’s hella sexy in the movie too. And speaking of sexy, don’t even get me started on Kathleen Byron…


6) Last movie seen in a theater/on physical media/by streaming In a theater (and not just any theater): Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (2024; George Miller); On physical media: The Leopard (1963; Luchino Visconti); Streaming: Uptight (1968; Jules Dassin).


7) Name a young actor in modern films who, either physically or by personality, reminds you of an actor from the age of classic movies Every time I see the young up-and-comer Kathryn Newton (Abigail, Freaky, Blockers) I think to myself, she’s gotta be related to Joan Blondell…


8)  Favorite film of 2014 For me, it didn’t get any better than the Scarlet Johannsen sci-fi one-two punch of Under the Skin (Jonathan Glazer) and Lucy (Luc Besson), though Clouds of Sils Maria (Olivier Assayas) came close.


9) Second-favorite Louis Malle film  How about Crackers? I’m kidding. Seriously, if Murmur of the Heart (1971) is my favorite, then I’d have to say that Elevator to the Gallows (1958) would be #2, with Vanya on 42nd Street (1994) somewhere in the vicinity.

10) The Ladykillers (2004 Coen Bros. version)—yes or no? I don’t see why not. The Coens’, in raunchy goof-off mode, bring their patented sensibility to bear on the legacy of the terrific Ealing Studios classic, and while Tom hanks is no Alec Guinness, he isn’t trying to be either and makes his own stamp on the character and the movie. Apparently doomed, sight unseen, to be a smudge mark on the history of a classic movie, it may not be a classic itself but it’s still a lot of fun.


11) Andy Robinson (Scorpio) or Richard Widmark (Tommy Udo)? At the risk of being burned at the stake as a heretic, I love Widmark in Kiss of Death (1947)—his is, to use a lately overused word, an iconic performance, at the very foundation of great portrayals of sadistic psychos in film noir and beyond. And though Andy Robinson’s terrifying performance as Scorpio in Dirty Harry</i> (1971) seems to directly reference Widmark at times (that cackle!), Robinson’s work has affected me far more profoundly than Widmark’s, by virtue of having seen it when I was very young (Dirty Harry was my first R-rated movie, at age 12), but also because Robinson is so preternaturally committed to the role, aware of his precedents but able to create memorable work in his own sphere. When I saw Robinson interviewed by Eddie Muller at this year’s TCM Classic Movies Film Festival before a screening of Dirty Harry, which has never been presented to these eyes more spectacularly, it was one of the top highlights of my 13 years of attending that festival. Did I feel lucky? Yes, Mr. Robinson. Thank you!



12) Best horror movie from the past ten years  Wow. For some reason, I decided to Google “best horror movies 2013-2024” to help try to answer this question and stumbled, after a bunch of false leads, onto IMDb’s presumably comprehensive list of 739 (!!!) horror movies released between those years. I have made it through the first 350 before I  found the first one I’d consider for the honor—not that I’m even close to having seen all 739 and knowing definitively, but a casual glance here reveals there’s a lot of shit out there, folks, even over just a ten-year span. Final tally on the ones I would choose comes to about 19… out of 739. Not a good return on your investment, horror fans. But I do like the list I came up with, which includes, in alphabetical order, Antlers (2021; Scott Cooper), The Babadook (2014; Jennifer Kent), Cult of Chucky (20217; Don Mancini), Crawl (2019; Alexandre Aja), Don’t Breathe (2016; Fede Alvarez), Easter (2016; Nicholas McCarthy, from the anthology film Holidays), Gerald’s Game (2017; Mike Flanagan),  Green Room (2015; Jeremy Saulnier), Happy Death Day (2017; Christopher Landon), 1922 (2017; Zak Hilditch), Pearl (2022; Ti West), The Prodigy (2019; Nicholas McCarthy), The Shallows (2017; Jaume Collett-Serra), Train to Busan (2016; Yeon Sang-ho), Unfriended (2014; Levan Gabriadze), Us (2019; Jordan Peele), The Visit (2015; M. Night Shamalyan), X (2022; Ti West), and the winner, only slightly out of that alphabetical order, The Witch (2015; Robert Eggers). If I’ve missed anything, and I’m sure I probably have, I am counting on all of you to remind me.


13) Upcoming movie release you have the highest hopes for in 2024 Given how luridly effective Ti West’s X (2022) was, and how devastated I was by his follow-up prequel Pearl (also 2022), it shouldn’t be much of a surprise that I am most dying to see how he and the mercurial Mia Goth ti (see what I did there?) things up in the upcoming MaXXXine. And my expectations are sky high for Richard Linklater’s Hit Man, which will be playing nowhere near me but will be assigned (like his last terrific movie, Apollo 10½: A Space-Age Childhood) to the Netflix shelf.  But more than anything, even, how could I not be looking forward to Francis Ford Coppola’s Megalopolis, be it masterpiece or disaster (or likely somewhere in-between)?


14)  Movie you’re looking forward to this year that would surprise people or make them consider that you might have finally cracked up. 
I think the clear winner here for me is the upcoming Ghost concert doc Rite Here, Rite Now (Alex Ross Perry), chronicling the recent  Los Angeles show by this theatrically perverse power-pop-metal band (equal parts Scorpions, Metallica and Donnie Iris, fueled by lots of amusingly warped Catholic iconography and blasphemously committed lyrics that make Mick Jagger’s sympathy for the devil look tepid in comparison) that Emma and I saw in October 2023. I hear tell they’re doing it up The Song Remains the Same-style too, so who knows what the hell we’re in for. My slight embarrassment over my enthusiasm was immediately washed away the moment I secured the tickets and watched Emma shoot straight through the roof.


15) Favorite AIP one-sheet Oh, my God, Mr. McAllister, give me a break. I grew up ogling the ad campaigns—newspaper pastings and one-sheets—for American International Pictures releases for almost as long as I can remember, and I’ve always loved their lurid dynamic, no matter the genre. What movie-ad kid could forget Blood and Lace (1971) (“Shock After Shock AFTER SHOCK!”)? Or the semi-clad brides of Count Yorga, Vampire (1970) (“Mistresses of the Deathmaster”) attacking some poor son of a  bitch and making him their midnight snack, all set against a counterintuitive, decidedly non-nocturnal turquoise background? Or the hard-sell psychedelic hysteria created for Richard Rush’s Psych-Out (1968)? Or Pam Grier lounging in that green dress on the one-sheet for Foxy Brown (1974)? Or the fantastic tableau of destruction created for Destroy All Monsters (1969)? But without making any claims that it’s the best of them all, I’d have to say my favorite AIP poster is for the 1972 release of the Angela Mao kung fu classic Lady Whirlwind, given by Samuel Arkoff and company a new title, Deep Thrust, in order to capitalize on a certain other phenomenon happening in American genre cinema at the time. There’s something so primitively appealing about the bare-bones visual distillation of the experience of this movie on this poster, combined with the usual hyperbolic verbiage (“Mistress of the Death Blow!”), that it stuck with me for 50 years, from the time I first saw a form of it on the movie pages of the Portland (OR) Oregonian to today, only about a year after having finally seen the movie for myself. I love it.


16) Catherine Spaak or Daniela Giordano? Giordano is a captivating screen presence, especially in Mario Bava’s sexy romantic comedy (unusual for him) Four Times That Night (1971). But Catherine Spaak wins my heart for Dario Argento’s Cat o’ Nine Tails (1971) but even more for the way she occupies a seat between Vittorio Gassman and Lean-Louis Trintignant in Dino Risi’s Il Sorpasso (1962).


17)  Favorite film of 1994 The top of my Best Of list for 1994 was headed up by Trois Couleurs: Rouge (Krzysztof Kieslowski), Cobb (Ron Shelton), Quiz Show (Robert Redford), Ed Wood (Tim Burton) and Vanya on 42nd Street (Louis Malle). But if “favorite” can be qualified by number of times seen, then my favorite films of 1994 would have to be Robert Altman’s Prêt-à-Porter (Ready to Wear)(yeah, yeah, yeah…) and Cabin Boy (directed by Adam Resnick, sure, but this is a Chris Elliot film through and through).



18) Second-favorite Wim Wenders film With the top spot firmly gripped by the five-hour director’s cut of his 1991 Until the End of the World (a masterpiece), positioned squarely midway through his great career, it’s worth recognizing that my third and then my second favorite Wim Wenders movie both come from the earlier and then the most recent mile markers of his extraordinary output—at #3, The State of Things (1982), and at #2, Perfect Days (2023), yes, an almost perfect movie.

19) Best performance by an athlete in a non-sports-oriented movie With all due respect to Jim Brown, Bo Svenson and Joe Namath (?), the only pick for me here is Jim Bouton as Terry Lennox, the worst best friend a private dick could ever have, in Robert Altman’s The Long Goodbye (1973).

20) The cinema’s Best Appearance by A Piece of Fruit Unless I’m forgetting something, for 88 years the answer—maybe the only answer—had to be that half a grapefruit so gently applied to Mae Clarke by Jimmy Cagney in The Public Enemy (1931)-- until 2019 and Parasite came along...


21) Favorite film of 1974
 Again, good God, Mr. McAllister… I’m so glad the wording is “favorite” and not “best.” Because in a year that saw the release of California Split, Freebie and the Bean, The Conversation, Chinatown, Juggernaut, The Taking of Pelham One Two Three and The Godfather Part II among many others I’m probably forgetting about at the moment, my favorites (a tie—sue me, Mr. McA) are unquestionably Mel Brooks’s Blazing Saddles and Tobe Hooper’s The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, two relatively disreputable pictures that have really grown in my estimation and hung with me in ways that continue to surprise me 50 years later.



22) Most would probably agree we are not currently living in a golden age of film criticism. Given that, who, among currently active writers, do you think best carries the torch for the form? For my money, it’s gotta be Justin Chang, who has risen through the ranks, from Variety to the Los Angeles Times and now, where more than one brilliant critic has called home, The New Yorker. And when I say “for my money,” I mean that quite literally—Chang’s presence alongside Richard Brody’s has inspired me to try to wrangle a subscription to this none-too-inexpensive periodical for Father’s Day!

23) Favorite movie theater snack(s) Well, it’s hard to beat a buttered popcorn, especially at the Rose, here in Port Townsend, where a combo of chipotle chorizo and asiago cheese seasonings makes this truly a compulsive snack for the ages. That said (and taking my type-2 diabetes into account), if there’s a candy selection on ice, say, a box of Charleston Chews or Junior Mints or, at the top of the heap, a completely frozen Uno bar (the way we used to gobble ‘em at the Circle JM Drive-in back in my hometown), I’ll go for that almost any time. To drink? A diet Coke or a Minute Maid zero-sugar lemonade, to make my endocrinologist sleep better at night.


24) Marion Lorne or Patricia Collinge? Two of Hitchcock’s dottiest mothers. Patricia Collinge, as Teresa Wright’s emotionally fragile mother in Shadow of a Doubt, engenders a lot of sympathy as she feels the ground crumbling beneath the idealized relationship she has with her brother Charlie (Joseph Cotton), who may be a serial killer. On the other hand, Marion Lorne softened me up for years with her portrayal of Samatha Stephens’ dotty-for-the ages Aunt Clara on Bewitched, so it was a genuine revelation for me to discover her relatively creepy, insinuating relationship with son Robert Walker, who very much is a killer in Strangers on a Train. Lorne’s screen time is short compared to Collinge’s, but she’s the actress I’d rather see in any part, and she’s brilliantly batty here.

25) Recent release you wish you’d seen on a big screen Hmm. Well, if Mr. McAllister will allow me to choose one that I haven’t yet seen but already have no possible chance of seeing projected, it’d have to be Richard Linklater’s upcoming Hit Man, which got leaked to theaters in bigger markets for a week before making its debut on Netflix on June 7.

26) Favorite supporting performance in a Sam Peckinpah film I’ve not allowed myself the luxury of IMDb here—it’s a total off-the-top-of-my-head game, and the winner is Peter Vaughn in Straw Dogs.

27) Strother Martin or L.Q. Jones? These two old salts seem to be joined at the hip in my mind, much the same way they were as scurrilous desert rats haunting Jason Robards in The Ballad of Cable Hogue. But I’d have to give the edge to Strother Martin, not only because of how he ultimately moved me in that film, but because he’s been so indelible in so many other films like McLintock (1963), The Wild Bunch (1969), Fools Parade (1971), Ssssssss (1973), Slap Shot (1977), Hard Times (1975) and, of course, Cool Hand Luke (1967). But then again, L.Q. Jones directed A Boy and His Dog (1975), didn’t he? And I used to say hi to him as he glided down the aisles in his cargo shorts and Hawaiian shirt at the Beachwood Canyon Mayfair Market back in the early ‘90s. Not so with Mr. Martin!

28) Current actor whose star status you find partially or completely mystifying It strikes me that Chris Pratt must either be the luckiest man in Hollywood or have the best, most bloodthirsty agent in town who has a lot of scurrilous info on a lot of industry folks.

29) Reese Witherspoon – Election or Freeway? Reese’s tornado of a turn in Freeway (1996), opposite a never-creepier Kiefer Sutherland, may be the wilder, more go-for-broke turn (and don’t get me wrong-- it’s a great turn), but as Tracy Flick in Election (1999) she is simultaneously obnoxious and sympathetic and a perfect avatar for unrestrained entitlement and hollowed-out achievement, which makes her the perfect antagonist/hero figure for our times. It’s a remarkably sustained balancing act of a performance which is set in brilliant relief when it becomes clearer and clearer that she’s not the only ghoul in Alexander Payne’s deck of acid cards. As good as she was as June Carter, I’d trade that Oscar-winning performance for this one every time.

30) Second-favorite Michael Ritchie film Okay, if #1 is now and ever shall be, world without end, amen, The Bad News Bears (1976), then there’s no way the #2 spot could go to anything but Smile (1975), a satire of Americana that not only stands with The Bad News Bears but also, I think, exists and interacts in close company with Robert Altman’s Nashville, released the same year.

31) Favorite theatrical moviegoing experience of the last three years (2021-2024)

Okay, as Mr. McAllister’s teaching assistant, I’m going to exercise a little license here. The last movie I saw in a theater before the COVID lockdown was Emma. (2020). About a day out of that screening the word came down that movie theaters (and a whole lot of other stuff) would be closing indefinitely. After a lifetime of making them some of my favorite places to be, there were times in that first year of the pandemic when I seriously wondered whether I’d ever step inside a movie theater again. But when things started opening up a little over a year later, with all necessary caution, I soon found the habit again, and consequently I feel like my appreciation for the experience, and my tendency to be a <i>whole</i> lot more picky about where I’d go to see a movie, was heightened. Not every experience has been memorable or special since then, but as I went about remembering for this answer, I realize a whole lot of them were. So here then are my 33 (yes, you read that right) favorite moviegoing experiences since our collective return from our various quarantines, in the order in which they occurred.

Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World (AMC Burbank 16, April 2021) Emma and I saw this 10th anniversary presentation together (I snuck her into a showing of the original release without Patty’s knowledge when she was 11, so this return seemed appropriate), and it is the only time, before or since, that seeing the AMC logo and their endless preshow junk parade brought me to tears. They have since returned to their usual shelf of contempt.

Summer of Soul (El Capitan, Hollywood, June 2021) A solo trip to Hollywood at 8:00 a.m. on a Sunday morning to make sure I saw this in an appropriately magnificent setting, and though the house was near empty, it was well worth the trip.

Nashville and McCabe and Mrs. Miller (Million Dollar Theater, Downtown Los Angeles, Summer 2021) A dream Saturday afternoon double bill at this storied downtown movie palace attended with my pal and fellow Altman fanatic Anastasia McGee.

No Time to Die (LOOK Cinemas, Glendale, November 2021) Another father-daughter night at the movies with Emma. This screening was memorable for me for the movie, of course, which we both enjoyed a lot more than either expected, but even more so for the father-daughter conversation we had before the show started, the subject of which I will not share here, only to say that it was one of those moments as a parent that completely changed my perspective on the child— no longer a child—who I helped raise.

The Godfather and The Godfather Part II (two nights, David Geffen Theater, Academy Museum, February 2022) The first night was with Emma, the second with Patty (I was ticketed to see The Godfather Part III later in the week, but I got sick), and both in the presence of Coppola and Talia Shire. I took Emma to see The Godfather for the first time a few years earlier (at the Million Dollar Theater)—she loved it and had seen it a few times more since, so for he to get to hear Coppola speak beforehand was a real treat.

Coffy (Turner Classic Movies Film Festival, April 2022) One of the best experiences at TCMFF I’ve ever had, in the presence of the goddess herself, who owned the house during her interview with TCM’s Jacqueline Stewart, and alongside equally appreciative pals Bruce Lundy, Odie Henderson and Steven Santos.

RRR (Laemmle Glendale, May 2022) Probably the most unbridled fun I’ve had in a movie theater in the three years this question spans. I don’t think anyone in the packed house I saw it with knew what we were getting into, and it was the most baseball game-like atmosphere I’ve ever seen in a  movie theater too, people reaching over and behind their rows to high-five other viewers after a particularly spectacular stunt or set piece. We stumbled out into the light of a Sunday afternoon, and many of us perfect strangers hung around the lobby just to marvel among ourselves at what we’d just been witness to, truly blindsided for once (no spoilers) by this truly spectacular work of popular art.

Top Gun: Maverick (AMC Media Center 8, June 2022) Please forgive me, but this one requires a bit of backstory:

My mother-in-law and I have been solid moviegoing pals since early on in my relationship with Patty. The first movie we ever saw together in a theater was The Last Boy Scout, way back in 1991– she is and always has been a big action movie fan, and together, sometimes with Patty and friends in tow, it seems like we saw them all. A few of her favorites were The Long Kiss Goodnight (1996), Die Hard With a Vengeance (1995), Casino Royale (2006; we saw all the Brosnan and Craig-era Bonds together), Payback (1999) with Mel Gibson and Crimson Tide (1995) starring Denzel Washington and Gene Hackman— my friend Andy and I took her to see that one at the Cinerama Dome, and her comment afterward (“I liked that one! Lots of manpower!”) has entered into my personal hall of fame of gratifying movie reactions.

In recent years, as she has become more frail and less energetic, and as COVID took its toll on national moviegoing habits our outings kind of tailed off. She didn’t care to see No Time to Die (2021) in a theater (and I was too nervous for her safety to seriously consider it). The last movie I took her to was Mission Impossible: Fallout (2018). She is the self-described Tom Cruise #1 Fan and there was no way she was going to miss that. (She even got to see it in IMAX.) But since then it’s been about four years since she’d seen the inside of a theater, and I figured her indifference to going out to see the latest James Bond was a signal that <i>Fallout</i> was going to be her moviegoing swan song.

Then one day  she pulled me aside and whispered, as if she could barely sound out the words for fear that it might turn out to be just a rumor, “I heard there’s a new Tom Cruise movie coming out— Top Gun 2!” I confirmed it and, on a lark, asked her if she wanted to go. She looked at me, and I swear her eyes twinkled. “Yeah, I think so,” she replied. And that’s all she had to say to me.

I began looking for movie theaters and showtimes as soon as I could, and I figured that my local neighborhood independent cinema, the Laemmle Glendale, would be a good candidate, if they were going to play it (they were, as it turned out)— small theaters, easy access, wheelchair seating. But as time moved on and mask restrictions on public places began dropping (unlike the actual incidences of new COVID cases), I began to get cold feet about the idea of taking Mommy out to a tiny, enclosed movie theater where she would be surrounded by who knows how many unmasked, possibly unvaccinated, possibly contagious popcorn munchers. I briefly considered even taking her to the drive-in— we have taken her in the past— but she’s not nearly ambulatory enough for such a complicated journey, and I’m sure she would have found being confined in the car for the long drive to and from, to say nothing of the long running time of the movie itself, an insurmountable situation.

I was about to give up on the idea altogether and suggest we just wait for home video— a depressing idea, given how infrequently she gets to get out of that house to do anything these days— when a light bulb went off above my head and caused a surely blinding light to reflect off my shiny pate: why not just pick a day and time and rent the theater? Then we could pick the location with the easiest access and solve the big problem of exposure to a possibly heavily populated and contagious auditorium with one easy move.

So I ran the idea past my sisters-in-law to see if they thought it was a good idea or just an ill-advised, cockamamie fantasy, and they were all for it. (I was especially solicitous of the advice of SIL Debbie, a doctor who heads up the infectious diseases program at a big San Francisco hospital who I felt could be trusted to tell me if she thought I should just drop it and keep Mommy at home.) She and Angie offered to split the shockingly affordable theater rental three ways, and so I booked it and began the month-long process of looking forward to the event, and to the surprise on her face when she would finally roll up to the theater and realize it would not be just another Saturday afternoon at the movies, but instead a private screening orchestrated just for her.


In addition to Patty, myself, Emma and Nonie, we invited a couple of our friends, Andy (he of the Crimson Tide outing) and Scott, and we also invited John and Jill, Mommy’s relatives and next-door neighbors, and Ramona and Paul, daughter and son of her recently-deceased best friend of many years. It all came together brilliantly, and it didn’t matter a bit that most of us weren’t really all that interested in seeing Top Gun: Maverick (2022)— what was important was that Mommy was going to get to see it without worrying about catching an awful disease as part of the price of admission. (She even brought her Tom Cruise pillow!)

The movie itself is an improvement on the 1986 original, which isn’t really saying much— it’s still a battleship-load of hooey, but it’s not aggressively obnoxious like its forebearer, and the last 45 minutes or so are exciting enough to make you more forgiving of the paucity of actual beauty in any of the imagery and of the fact that it’s as much a recruitment tool in the post-Trump Ukraine war era as the original was an embodiment of hollow Reagan-era patriotism. Neither movie is overtly political, but they don’t need to be— it’s all about the fetishistic fascination for military hardware, which is something craven political opportunists of both periods can and have appropriated for their own ugly ends.


But like I suggested earlier, who cares what I or any of us thought of the movie. Mommy was the only one who counted today, and she loved it. She said over and over again that she couldn’t believe we had the whole theater to ourselves, and that she was so happy and surprised. (John and Jill surprised us all by hitting the snack bar for popcorn, soda and candies for everybody!) So I’d count this day as a smash hit, one that, in our family annals anyway, far surpasses the box office take for the new Tom Cruise blockbuster. Oh, and by the way, the movie was preceded by a trailer for the next Mission: Impossible epic. Mommy fully endorsed booking our theater for that one as soon as possible. More on that later.

Memoria
 (Laemmle Glendale, July 2002) Just one of the reasons I came to cherish this little neighborhood theater, just four blocks from my old house in Glendale, was the chance to see a film like Apichatpong Weerasethakul’s monumental film on the big screen. The nearly empty house only added to the movie’s startlingly insinuating, hushed effect.

Mad God
 (Alamo Drafthouse, Downtown Los Angeles, June 2022) With my pal Andy, experiencing Phil Tippett’s one-of-a kind wonder at this brilliant shrine to movie geekdom, preceded by a terrific presentation (curated by the theater) on the history of stop-motion animation in the movies.

Fire of Love 
(Rose Theatre, Port Townsend, August 2022) Our first experience at the Rose Theatre in downtown Port Townsend, during our family summer vacation on the Olympic Peninsula. My second screening of the movie, Patty’s first. After it was over we knew I’d found our new home.

In The Mood for Love
 (David Geffen Theater, Academy Museum, September 2022) This was Patty’s introduction to Wong Kar-wai’s masterpiece and my first time ever seeing it projected, the perfect setting. To say we were both transported is putting it very mildly indeed.

Pearl
 (Laemmle Glendale, September 2022) Emma and I saw X here earlier in the year, so of course we were there opening weekend for Ti West’s sequel (the second in his trilogy). We both loved it, but I found it so disturbing, especially the last ten minutes (here’s one where not staying for the duration of the end credits is virtually impossible), that I couldn’t shake it-- I walked around the real world for days after, genuinely haunted by what I’d seen. (So did Martin Scorsese, apparently.)

Millennium Mambo
 (American Cinematheque at the Los Feliz Theater, February 2023) I could not pass up the chance to get absorbed in Hou Hsaio-hsien's awesome movie on the big screen, and the rewards were many.

John Wick: Chapter 4
 (Laemmle Glendale, TCL Chinese IMAX, March 2023) Twice in one week, both times with Emma, both times overwhelming fun.

When Worlds Collide
 (Turner Classic Movies Film Festival, April 2023) Bruce and I saw this fantastic screening, hosted by the great sound designers Ben Burtt and Craig Barron. The movie was really fun, featuring good actors (including the late Barbara Rush, the cutest cutie pie in all of ‘50s cinema), terrific special effects and, courtesy of our hosts, an overwhelmingly effective soundtrack retrofitted with Burtt’s own version of Sensurround (BENSurround, of course) which fulfilled George Pal’s dreams for the movie, as well as shook the shit out of our internal organs and quite literally blew the side doors of the Hollywood Legion Hall where we saw it wide open more than once.

Contempt
 (American Cinematheque at the Los Feliz Theater, July 2023) My first time seeing Godard’s classic on the big, wide screen. Brilliant.



Mission: Impossible—Dead Reckoning Part 1 (AMC Media Center 8, Burbank, August 2023) Whoops, we did it again!

Taste the Blood of Dracula
 and Frankenstein Must Be Destroyed (New Beverly Cinema, October 2023) Fittingly, this great Hammer double bill, featuring the best print of FMBD I think I’ve ever seen, was the last time I attended the New Beverly Cinema to date. And just by chance, I ran into Michael Torgan, who I hadn’t seen in a couple of years, and we got to spend about a half hour talking outside before the movies began.




Oppenheimer (TCL Chinese Theatre, August 2023) Before it became clear that Universal was going to have to schedule more IMAX screenings, I grabbed the chance to get up at 4:30 on a Sunday morning and make my way onto a blessedly quiet Hollywood Boulevard for a 6:00 a.m. IMAX screening of Christopher Nolan’s soon-to-be-Oscar-winning hit. And that damn theater was packed. As much eerie fun as a movie about the dawning of the end of the world could have possibly been.

Stop Making Sense (two screenings, TCL Chinese Theatre, September 2023) The 40th-anniversary rerelease afforded us two chances to see this masterpiece really big and loud. The second time Patty and I took Emma, but the first time was a pre-rerelease screening timed to the Talking Heads reunion at the Toronto Film Festival, where it was screening the same night. There were folks dancing on the Chinese Theatre’s massive stage for the last two songs, and after the movie was finished we were treated to a live feed from Toronto featuring all four Heads interviewed post-TIFF-screening by Spike Lee.

Farewell, My Concubine
 (Laemmle Glendale, September 2023) Once again, thank you, my favorite neighborhood theater in my old neighborhood.

Ugetsu
 (Laemmle Glendale, October 2023) My first time ever seeing this on the big screen. Is it any wonder this theater is about the only thing I miss about Glendale?

1900
 (Ted Mann Theater, Academy Museum, November 2023) I packed a lunch and gave up an entire Saturday to see the uncut 317-minute version of Bertolucci’s harrowing masterpiece (one intermission between the officially segmented two parts) and it was some of the most rewarding time I’ve ever spent in a theater.

Godzilla Minus One
 (AMC Burbank 16, December 2023) Emma, Nonie and I reveled in our first screening of this surprisingly great movie together, and they were only slightly less surprised than I was that, after a nuanced and terrifying story well told, the climax had me in racking sobs. So glad to see it has now cleared the restrictions that have prevented it being screened in the US (in the wake of its Best Special Effects Oscar win later in March) and can be seen streaming and for digital purchase all over the place. But nothing will ever beat seeing it in a theater, especially for the first time.

The Devil and Daniel Webster (All That Money Can Buy) 
(December 2023) This special screening of the recent 4K restoration of this mind-boggling movie was the very first time I’d ever seen in any form, under any title, and I’m so glad it was on the big screen, where it mesmerized me from start to finish.

Ed Wood
 (Nuart Theater, Santa Monica, February 2024) Somehow it worked out that this would be the last movie I would ever see as a citizen of Los Angeles, and it was beyond perfect that I was able to make it across town on a Friday night just before our exhausting move would commence in earnest to see this paean to the creative spirit as it once manifested itself in this moviemaking capital where I spent 37 years of my life.

Perfect Days (The Rose Theatre, Port Townsend, March 2024) And speaking of perfect, it’s hard for me to express right now just how perfect it was that Wim Wenders’ great movie was the first theatrical film I ended up seeing as an official resident of Port Townsend. I just wanted to see a good movie, and instead I saw one that, though it was very much about perceptions of modern Japanese culture and how one man defines and comes to peace with himself amidst that culture, seemed also to speak directly to my soul and where it sits at this crossroads in my life.

The First Omen
 (SEE Film Cinemas, Bremerton, WA, April 2023) It was our first get-out-of-town movie—that was Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire at a Regal in Poulsbo—but this was the first one where Emma and I saw a really good, satisfying movie. It was one of our first steps in making ourselves feel like part of the community of Port Townsend and the surrounding towns. That process continues, thankfully!

Dirty Harry
 (Turner Classic Movies Film Festival, April 2024) I’ve never seen this brutal, troubling, electrifying crime thriller, the first R-rated movie I ever saw (at age 12 in my hometown drive-in), look so fantastic. Add to that the experience of seeing Andy Robinson speak beforehand (described movie, answer #11) and you’ve got an unforgettable experience.

The Beast
 (The Rosebud inside the Rose Theatre, Port Townsend, May 2024) Not unlike my experience with Pearl, this challenging, intricate film, anchored by a brilliant performance from Lea Seydoux, is the scariest thing I've seen in a theater in ages, far outstripping recent highly touted horror offerings in the level of fear it generates and in its own boundary-pushing filmmaking intensity, and it took me nearly a week to shake it off. Actually, I'm not sure I really have even yet.

Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga
 
(SIFF Downtown-- formerly the Cinerama, May 2024) This theater is as good as advertised, and seeing Furiosa here, my first experience at the theater, was a spectacular introduction.
 one of the most overwhelming sonic and visual presentations I’ve ever been lucky enough to attend. Only George Miller could, or apparently would even care to infuse the end of the world with this much nerve-jangling exhilaration, and it sent me out of the theater on the sort of big-budget movie high the likes of which I haven’t experienced since perhaps Mad Max: Fury Road.

32) Favorite Southern-fried movie sheriff
 With all due respect to Buford T. Justice (aka Jackie Gleason) and J.W. Pepper (aka Clifton James), I’m gonna go dark and choose Ned Beatty, never more sinister and insinuating (especially in his deadpan, where he hides behind assumed good-ol’-boy charms he never forefronts) than as Sheriff J.C. Connors, the murderous lawman set against Burt Reynolds’ Gator McCluskey in Joseph Sargent’s crackling-good White Lightning (1973). And in Connors’s shadow, you might just find the sheriff who greets Reynolds, Jon Voight and Beatty himself near the end of Deliverance (1972), a cynical lawman played by James Dickey, presiding gruffly, sometimes disapprovingly, and even more insinuatingly over John Boorman’s grueling adaptation of Dickey’s own book. I’d bet Beatty took notes on this performance and incorporated them into his own just a year later.



33) Favorite film of 1954 Any year that saw the release of Kiss Me, Deadly, Bad Day at Black Rock, Rear Window, Dam Busters, On the Waterfront, Creature from the Black Lagoon, Seven Samurai, Them!, Johnny Guitar, La Strada and the original Godzilla has to be considered a great year for movies. And the greatest, my most favorite? Take a bow, Yasujiro Ozu’s Tokyo Story.

34) A 90-foot wall of water or the world tallest building on fire? The Poseidon Adventure (1972) is certainly the OG of the now-50-plus-year-old disaster movie cycle, but of the two I’m inclined to favor the big dog these days-- The Towering Inferno. OG, meet apex, the big movie statement this ‘70s subgenre would never again approach. (That said, I have a great and widely acknowledged fondness for Airport ‘77 which I suspect I will carry with me to my grave.)

35) Second-favorite Agnes Varda movie My favorite is Varda’s sublimely beautiful and understated love letter to her Parisian neighborhood, the 1975 documentary Daguerréotypes. So that leaves second place to be occupied possibly by Vagabond (1985) or perhaps Mur Murs (1981). But really there’s no contest: second place goes to her beautiful and moving feature swansong, Faces Places (2017).

36) Favorite WWII movie made between 1950 and 1975 Again, leaving it all up to the top of my head, the one that made a really huge impression on  me, when I was lucky enough to see on the big Egyptian screen courtesy of the American Cinematheque a few years ago, was Sam Fuller’s Merrill’s Marauders (1962).

37) After the disappointing (against predictions) box-office weekend for The Fall Guy, writer Matt Singer, perplexed by the relative indifference from ticket-buyers toward a film most expected to be a big hit, asked in his piece for Screengrab,  “What the hell do people want from movies?” To focus the question slightly more narrowly, what the hell do you want out of movies? I want a movie to surprise me, to challenge my expectations, to show me facets of a world (our world, its world) that I might never have considered before. Whether or not a movie makes money at the box office is absolutely immaterial to its worth—how many of your favorite films, of my favorite films, were flops at the box office? What I want is a movie that is worth coming out to see, whether it’s an overwhelming sound-and Furiosa epic, or a movie like Perfect Days or The Beast</i>, films that demand something from their audiences and give back rewards (and in the case of  The Beast, nightmares) that could never be anticipated, and for the movies themselves to have more than an opening weekend’s chance to lure the audiences that would most enjoy them in the company of strangers inside a movie house.

38) Ned Sparks or Guy Kibbee? Both have their specific and beloved niches in pre-code Hollywood comedies, but I gotta give the edge to Guy Kibbee, a little less one-note than Sparks, hilarious in Golddiggers of 1933 (1933) and Dames (1934) and downright moving in Central Park (1932).

39) Favorite opening line in a movie There are surely better, wittier, more resonant ones in the storied history of the movies, but for me one of the ones that best sets the tone for what’s to come is seeing Ava Gardner in her lounging gown stumble into the ostensibly posh (no thanks to the Universal production design department) apartment she shares with her increasingly estranged husband Charlton Heston, noting his absence and uttering a perfectly vituperative “GodDAMN it!” After that, the wrath of God in Sensurround seems tame by comparison.

40) Best movie involving radio or a radio broadcast Obvious choices for me might include American Graffiti (1973) for its hauntingly pervasive radio broadcast soundtrack of late ‘50s-early ‘60s pop radio hits, and for that scene with Wolfman Jack broadcasting from that eerily quiet station on the outskirts of town (that scene best reflects my own nascent fascination with radio and radio stations when I was a kid); or maybe, if I stretch the boundaries of the question, Jonathan Demme’s Citizens Band (1977), a beautifully woven tale of identities lost, found and created over the air on CB radio in a small town. I’m even thinking about the intrusive PA radio broadcasts that pervade the hospital camp in Robert Altman’s M*A*S*H (1970). And there’s Sex and Broadcasting (2014), a terrific documentary about New Jersey’s own WFMU and one man’s effort to keep the station alive in the face of recession, the never-ending threat of commercial media invasion and the challenges of keeping a staff of weirdos (benign and less-than-benign) in line. But the one that really makes the nostalgic case for radio, what it was, what we remember it to be, and what It may never have been, is Woody Allen’s lovely and evocative Radio Days (1987), in which nostalgia achieves a warm, penetrating aesthetic that goes beyond radio and straight into the ways we embellish our memories—“The scene is Rockaway. The time is my childhood. It’s my old neighborhood, and forgive me if I tend to romanticize the past. I mean, it wasn’t always as stormy and rainswept as this. But I remember it that way because that was it at its most beautiful.”


41) Buddy Buddy—yes or no? Absolutely yes.

42) Favorite film of 1934 I tried, but I just cannot choose between Josef von Sternberg’s The Scarlet Empress and Jean Vigo’s L’Atlante, so they both get top dog honors for their 90th anniversaries.


43) Kay Francis or Miriam Hopkins? Hopkins may have made better movies overall, at least in the early stage of her career-- Design for Living</i> (1933), Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1931), The Story of Temple Drake (1933)--  but all Kay Francis has to do is approach the camera at the end of Jewel Robbery, the nifty romantic comedy she made with William Powell in 1932, and I’d follow her anywhere. And you know, the movie these two made together in 1932 with that fella Ernst Lubitsch, Trouble In Paradise isn’t exactly chopped liver either.

44) What’s the oddest thing a movie theater employee has ever said to you? Recently a friend and I were watching Challengers at a small theater in a nearby town. We happened to be the only customers for the first Saturday afternoon showing and were enjoying our private screening, but at some point I had to make a quick exit to the little boy’s room. As I left the auditorium and crossed the snack bar toward my goal, the man running the show—literally—looked up from where he was seated near the popcorn machine and asked sincerely, “You want me to pause the movie for you?” I hope he didn’t think me rude, but I had to laugh, especially when I imagine my friend sitting in the auditorium alone and suddenly watching the frame freeze, expecting the old-school melting frame we’d seen so many times in our hometown theater which, of course, this being a DCP, would never come. I thanked him for his concern but told him I’d be in and out very quickly. I sometimes think I’ve heard it all in my 64 years, and then…

45) Is there such a thing as an ideal running time for a movie? Is X too long? Is Y too short? I get the feeling people who are concerned about this issue just want everything to be a neat-and-tidy TV show (or a leisurely paced long-form one) and not let themselves surrender to the particular rhythms any one film might have. So of course I think it’s absurd to try to suggest there’s anything like an ideal running time. The Irishman (2019) is the perfect length at 209 minutes, and so is Central Park (1932) at 58 minutes. So I think the answer is: If a movie is really good, it is as long or short as it needs to be.

46) Favorite Roger Corman movie(s) On the day he died (yesterday), my favorite Roger Corman movies were The Premature Burial (1962), X- The Man with X-Ray Eyes (1963), The Tomb of Ligeia (1964) and The Masque of the Red Death (1964)—that’s a hell of an account over two years, and those are only four of the 12 (!!!) movies he made during that short period. But tonight (the day after he died), I’m gonna watch The Wild Angels (1966) again, and maybe The St. Valentine’s Day Massacre (1967)  or Bloody Mama (1970) again after that, so anything could happen.

 

 ******************************************

 






Saturday, January 08, 2022

NIGHTMARE ALLEY (2021)



Guillermo Del Toro's Nightmare Alley turned out to be the last movie I saw in 2021, and I can hardly imagine a better farewell to this year in which the world seemed increasingly claustrophobic, much of its citizenry engaged in duping or being duped, in blinding campaigns of continual carny-level chicanery elevated to national disaster, the duped refusing to believe their own eyes (and science) over the lies that line up with what they want to believe.


Not being entirely in the director’s bag (I had reservations about his last three movies, Pacific Rim, Crimson Peak and even his Oscar-winning The Shape of Water) I resisted the pull of this picture for a good portion of its first half hour. But this nightmare vision sucked me in. Del Toro seems at the top of his game here, adapting the original novel and the 1947 movie classic from a script co-written with film critic Kim Morgan, and it’s a hellish, seductive vision. Moment to moment, the movie may often register as too much design, or too much physical detail, or just too much, period. But it gets into your bones, and your humanity, and your inhumanity, just as the original film did, just as all superb noirs do, and the audience that allows itself the distinct pleasure of settling into the world Del Toro conjures will be amply rewarded and unsettled.

Reports of Bradley Cooper as being miscast here (too old to be continually referred to as “young buck,” said the wags) are completely off the mark, especially when you see what the actor does with the character of drifter-turned-mentalist-phenomenon Stan Carlisle (Tyrone Power in the 1947), and the harrowing inevitability of where he ends up. (I cannot shake his final image, or his final line.) But the entire cast responds to the thrall of Del Toro’s visual commitment, and to his refusal to be rushed into a overstimulated approach to laying out this fiercely beautiful and frightening milieu. Toni Collette, David Strathairn, Willem Dafoe, Rooney Mara, they’re all excellent as denizens of the carnival world Stan knows (or thinks he knows) he’s too sharp not to escape. And in crucial but smaller roles, as two of Stan’s higher-class marks, Mary Steenburgen and Richard Jenkins make potent, indelible impressions.

However, a special place in my dark heart is reserved for Cate Blanchett, an actress I often receive as too diagrammed and distanced in her performances. But as she also proved in Thor: Ragnarok, she’s an actress who can be fully at home in cutting loose and embodying, precisely and pleasurably, the movie she’s in, and she conjures this femme fatale, a psychiatrist who ostensibly helps Stan with his entree into the world of the moneyed victims that will ultimately lead him straight to hell, with seductive, iconographic awareness, all the better for when she takes Stan in her teeth for the final bite. Her exit from this picture made me laugh out loud at the sheer audaciousness, both of the dialogue that provides her the perfect punctuation and of her instincts in the movie’s penultimate climax.

I’m not surprised that audiences at Christmastime during a pandemic are staying away from a picture whose advertising duly hints at the level of bleakness in store for them. But it’s a shame that the movie seems on its way out of theaters already— I caught the last performance at my local movie emporium— because this is a movie that knows how to deliver the goods to a receptive audience. I don’t know how well it will play at home, where distractions are aplenty, but having been happy to have submitted to it in the dark, I can’t wait to lay my hands on a Blu-ray in a couple months and find out. At the risk of sounding like a barker milling the masses to be fleeced, I’d encourage you to see Nightmare Alley on a big screen (fully masked, of course). Good show!

******************************

FRENCH CONNECTION II (1974)

 

When I was 11 years old, The French Connection came out and joined a list of pictures I was too young to see (Clockwork Orange, Straw Dogs, Dirty Harry, Shaft) but would obsess over anyway. I even read the book, which somehow was okay with my parents because, I guess, it wasn’t rated R. I saw my first R-rated movie, Dirty Harry, later that year, but I never saw TFC until I was in college, and though it was among the first cassettes I ever bought for my new Betamax in 1982, once I finally did see it William Friedkin’s movie never lived up to my heightened expectations. Seeing it again last month for the first time in years only confirmed that, its landmark car chase excepted, I think of The French Connection as a fairly routine, relentless cop thriller that, despite Gene Hackman’s Oscar-winning performance, is hardly the best of its kind.


In fact, I’d only ever “seen” the movie in MAD magazine (“WHAT’S THE CONNECTION?”) before I saw its sequel, French Connection II, at my hometown movie palace, the Alger Theater, sometime in late 1975. I was determined to love it, and I did like it a lot, though I remember thinking that it didn’t feel at all like what I expected its predecessor might. In fact, this would be the first of two sequels made from William Friedkin-directed megahits, both of which would stray from the path of simply ghosting the template of the original, a strategy that would not exactly endear either film to audiences or critics. The sequel John Frankenheimer made to TFC is certainly not an admirable oddity like Exorcist II: The Heretic, nor is it, like that film, a daring artistic failure, but it must have certainly frustrated those who came to theaters expecting their pulses to be pounded in the manner of the original film.


Whereas Popeye Doyle (and Hackman) by nature dominated the grim, burnt-out NYC milieu of the first film, FCII transplants the detective to Marseilles, where his overt racial bigotry can be directed exclusively, and in classic really-ugly-American fashion, toward his French counterparts, and where the movie can monitor Doyle’s fury at being brought over to ostensibly pursue Frog One (Fernando Rey, reprising his role as drug kingpin Alain Charnier), only to realize he’s being used as bait to lure the criminal into position to be grabbed by the local police force.


But Frankenheimer and screenwriters Alexander Jacobs, Robert Dillon and Laurie Dillon, doggedly, some might even say perversely refuse to follow in Friedkin’s footsteps. FCII is mapped out and directed as if the location (shot evocatively by Claude Renoir) seeped into their bones— it feels more like an arty policier that might have been made by any number of French directors of the time, its concerns much more in locating the core of Doyle’s blackened heart than in replicating the gritty, nihilistic thrills of Friedkin’s movie. One of the true strengths of FCII is how it conveys Doyle’s sense of abandonment, his lack of any real French connection, how he feels adrift in a culture, and more precisely a policing culture, that he doesn’t understand or respect— to that end, the movie provides no subtitles for its extensive French dialogue; like Doyle, the audience is left to fend for itself and extract meaning from context, observation and multiple conversations that lead nowhere.


Hackman may have won his first Oscar for the original film, but this is the far more rich, interesting, compelling performance. The actor courts our empathy at being lost in a language and society he doesn’t comprehend, but he’s no less blusteringly self-righteous for that; he makes a crude art of alienation, because he can’t allow himself to believe that any other method than his own could possibly be effective. Beyond all that, however, the filmmakers allow Hackman to dominate the center of the film in an entirely unexpected way— about 45 minutes in, Doyle is nabbed by Charnier’s thugs and, in an attempt to rid themselves of their American albatross, they string him out on the heroin they’re trafficking and then, when he’s entirely dependent, toss him back into the street. What follows is a long, harrowing, and strangely moving section in which Doyle, with the help of the French detective (Bernard Fresson) he refers to more as “Asshole” than by his actual name, agonizes through narcotic withdrawal on his way back toward the world and his now-elevated fury over Charnier and the way he has been used to tease the kingpin out into the open.


Perversely, or perhaps daringly, Frankenheimer and company have structured this section of the movie to be their stand-in for the prolonged car chase which is probably one of the only things people remember from the first movie. It is the film’s raison d’etre, its meaning, the polluted blood coursing through FCII, and it alters the perspective of the entire enterprise, including Doyle’s own sense of outrage and refusal to heed any precaution or safety in seeing his own personal mission to its end. It’s a gutsy, not entirely rational response to the mission of following up a well-respected Oscar-winning thriller, which is in its way, like Doyle’s, its own personal mission, and it turns what could have been a rote regurgitation designed to sell popcorn into something akin to a living, breathing creation, something made to respond to the world instead of just make furious noise within it.


FCII ends on a more definitive note than its closure-denying predecessor, but even in that definition Frankenheimer finds room to undercut any true sense that Doyle has finally completed his task. With an abrupt cut to end credits just before we can process the resolution we seem to have witnessed, we get Doyle’s shot at some measure of release, of payback, alongside the simultaneous realization after the cut that things are still moving on the water, that we can never really be sure if the prey is down or simply delayed in the game.


At a time when a tidal wave trend toward commodifying sequels was only just beginning, French Connection II, in a way perhaps more modest but spiritually akin to Coppola’s work in expanding the tale of the Corleone family the previous year, proved that it is possible to honor origins by mining character more than simply committing a hollow act of imitation. It may not be particularly well remembered in the shadow of its 1971 predecessor, but it should be.

***********************************

SHORT ENDS: LAMB and COPSHOP

 


Lamb was not at all what I was expecting, though I’m not sure what I was expecting-- the trailer suggests it might be another Midsommar-esque horror tale, and like that movie, it's also brought to you by the good folks at A24-- but thankfully even after having seen the trailer I had no idea where it was going. (Bela Tarr is listed as a producer in the end credits, so that might give you a clue as to the movie’s tone, at least.) It’s certainly not a horror film though, nor is it exactly the sort of traumatic metaphor of parental loss I anticipated (though it is in the neighborhood).

Lamb
lands more squarely in the realm of a very deliberate, foreboding folk tale-- if you're prepared to laugh you probably will, but it may also get under your skin. Despite my ill response to Noomi Rapaace, an actress whose appeal seems forbidden to me, I found it hypnotic (especially the way the director uses those gloomy, gorgeous Icelandic landscapes) and weirdly moving, right up to its creepy conclusion, for which I don't think the movie lays quite enough foundation. I think I liked it most, though, because it was a movie with its own quiet world of rhythms and pace which I could settle into on a Friday night after a relentless, pedal-to-the-metal week, and for the fact that that its impulses and sympathies were unlike what movies from any country feel compelled to serve up these days. (TRIGGER WARNING: There is a bit of animal death, though not graphic. The animal births, however, are not for the squeamish…)

*********************



Copshop is a hoot and a holler, and I certainly wouldn’t have guessed it. Both Gerard Butler as a professional hit man and Frank Grillo as his slimy mob con target hold the screen like, well, professionals. But the show is handily stolen by Alexis Louder as the bored Nevada cop who ends up in a standoff with the two of them in the titular, bullet-and-corpse-littered police station. She is the real deal— funny, sharp, believable and never quite in the zone you’d expect. Hers is, or should be, a star-making performance— we’ll see. And the movie gets a major assist from Toby Huss as the gregariously deranged contract murderer who wants to wipe them all out. In the post-Tarantino landscape, it’s unusual to see someone pull off an over-the-top piece of acting like this— genuinely creepy/funny/original and not catastrophically smug— but Huss figures out how to do it. Director Joe Carnahan makes the whole she-bang a visual hoot and a holler too. Between this and The Protege from earlier this year, that’s a lot of solid, clever, mean, female-centric action from a couple of low-flying, unexpected sources. Good show!

Saturday, August 07, 2021

FIVE FOR THE AGES: 2021 SO FAR

I haven’t seen much so far in 2021, and much of it has been either worthy, if flawed (Roadrunner: A Film About Anthony Bourdain) or flat-out incoherent and reprehensible (The Hitman’s Wife’s Bodyguard). But there have been five films released in 2021 so far which I have unequivocally loved.


1) As big leaps in visual storytelling go, David Lowery’s The Green Knight marks a significant one for him, out of the clutches of dead-end Malick homages (like 2013’s insufferable Ain't Them Bodies Saints and 2017’s emotionally effective but sometimes too precious A Ghost Story) and onto a masterful confidence that accesses a rare quality in modern movies—a sense of genuine mystery.

Lowery’s film is an adaptation of the poem “Sir Gawain and the Green Knight” (you probably read it in college; somehow, I did not and never have), in which the nephew of King Arthur, young Gawain, played with almost sculpted perfection and empathy, sans a trace of cloying, by Dev Patel, accepts a Christmas day challenge from the titular arboreal nobleman to offer a blow in combat which will then be reciprocated a year later. (The film’s first line, “Christ is born,” uttered over the visage of a sleeping Gawain stunned out of a suggestive dream of chivalry by a bucket of water, grounds the narrative’s engagement of an age of magic making its transition toward another sort of mythology.) Gawain accepts the challenge and impulsively offers the knight not a laceration but a beheading. But when the knight’s decapitated body rises and rides off holding his own head, Gawain is set upon his own quest, girded by the incorporeal guidance of his sorceress mother Morgan Le Fay (Sarita Choudhury), who it seems has conjured the Green Knight’s presence in the first place, to fulfill the demands of the game and meet the knight a year later so that his own violent gesture can be returned in kind.

Gawain’s journey to meet the Green Knight and his fate is, of course, episodic in nature, the young would-be knight encountering thieves, ghost, giants, mysterious noblemen and women, and even a talking fox, all with secret motivations of their own, and along the way losing gifts given (like his mother’s protective sash and the Green Knight’s enormous ax), only to be reunited with them in moments that reinforce the film’s sly doubling motifs. But Lowery mounts the entire journey with enchanting visual strategies that suggest the circularity of experience, the inevitability of time (and its possible reversal), the weight of loss, and a hallucinatory dream quality that suffuses Gawain’s pursuit of what it means to be worthy of leading a honorable life—in its way, The Green Knight is Lowery’s own Gawain-esque fulfillment of the promise of the themes of nature and temporality that were improbably raised in his most commercial project to date, 2016’s lovely and entirely unexpected remake of Disney’s Pete’s Dragon. The director carries a willing audience along on waves of visual grammar and wit that are less related to the fevered Wagnerian blasts of John Boorman’s Excalbur and closer to the contemplative pastoral inquiry of Robert Bresson’s Lancelot du Lac, yet that grammar and wit are ultimately proven to be entirely his own. And in a film about a young man’s shadowing of his own story, Lowery even manages clever references to the process of narrative and filmmaking that for once do not come off as if we were being held hostage by the overconfident cackling of a director-raconteur seduced by his own mastery and incapable of not showing it off, to the ultimate detriment of his own creation.

As with any surprising and original work, it’s best to go into The Green Knight with only the sketchiest of expectations, although by now the sort of praise it’s been gathering comes with its own set of expectations apart of the actual action of the film. (After you’ve seen it, I highly recommend Justin Chang’s excellent full-on appraisal in the Los Angeles Times.) It’s a serious consideration of notions and  quasi-historical narratives of chivalry and honor that one would think impossibly quaint nearly 50 years after the sort of pop culture disembowelment served up by Monty Python, and it conjures a world of real and imagined magick, and that includes magick of the cinematic sort, with both surprising guilelessness and a surety that can make a jaded audience gasp. The marvelous cast, apart from Patel (making up for appearing in last year’s worst film, The Personal History of David Copperfield, by appearing in a candidate for this year’s best), includes Alicia Vikander, doubly beguiling as Gawain’s tomboyish love, whom he leaves behind, and a mysterious enchantress who may spell his doom, as well as seasoned character actors like Sean Harris, Kate Dickie, Joel Edgerton, and best of all, Ralph Ineson, whose great, quarry-deep voice perfectly inhabits the grandeur of the hulking, creaking, rustling, forbidding, seductive figure of the film’s title, and who eloquently embodies its most enrooted concepts of nature and inevitability.

And they are all led by a young director who is, with any luck, apparently just now hitting his stride. Like its namesake, Lowery and The Green Knight invite us on an unexpected journey we cannot but accept, one whose sweetest and most profound rewards cannot be anticipated, one which will, if you’re like me, resonate long after the film’s soaring penultimate image and its final, sweetly ambiguous words have passed into the mists of memory, where the movie promises to live from a forgotten age, of tales and of glorious movies, for a long, long time.


2) At first I thought I might well find Carlos López Estrada’s Summertime insufferable— it’s a celebratory comedy-drama built around sequences in which many of the 30 young characters, who float in and around Los Angeles during the film’s 95-minute running time, frequently express themselves in poetic verse (poems the actors wrote themselves). But the movie breaks down all resistance almost immediately with visual poetry that augments and enhances those recitative passages and suffuses them with what can only be considered the near-equivalent of song-and-dance sequences which might be found in a more straightforward musical. That poetry is put to powerful dramatic use as well, and by the movie’s end the tears Summertime earns are a mixture of a piercing emotionality and the rapture of seeing such material so well served, so eloquently expressed.  In its very own, unique way it’s a lovely, generational response to the sort of American expressionism that has itself frequently been marginalized, fulfilling the promise of a more fantastical work like In the Heights and adding to a legacy of social and political portraiture that has its roots in masterworks like Nashville and Do The Right Thing. (The movie shares an observational acuity toward LA with those movies and their settings too.) And I guess I needn’t have worried that I wouldn’t be transported by Summertime— how could I have ever not loved a movie that has, as one of its threads, the pursuit of a real Los Angeles cheeseburger, and locates the climax of that search in such a unifying, and yes, inspirational gesture of community and empathy?


3) “We were creating a new world…” Summer of Soul is that rare piece of work that, in its own way, seems almost as important as the event it documents, especially given the past few summers we’ve had to endure as a country, as a species. Joyous tears will likely never be too far from spilling, as they were for me, witnessing the otherworldly, yet completely of this world performances of Gladys Knight and the Pips, Sly and the Family Stone, Abbey Lincoln, Nina Simone and especially Mavis Staples, on her own and in rapturous duet with the great Mahalia Jackson. I love Mavis Staples, perhaps beyond reason and propriety. But I was also just as thrilled that director Questlove, in making beautiful music of both the concerts and the social context in which they occurred, managed to make time to include Moms Mabley (who gets off a great joke about the concurrent NASA moon mission which resonates today, as millionaires indulge their own space fantasies while citizens continue to be marginalized and murdered and while the planet burns), and for a moving interlude in which Marilyn McCoo and Billy Davis Jr. are overwhelmed with emotion as they watch footage of their performance at the 1969 Harlem Cultural Festival, which this documentary commemorates (or should that be resuscitates?), and talk about their experience as artists perceived as not having been “Black enough.” This movie is as close to genuine cinematic bliss as I’ve experienced in years, and I’m so glad I got to see it on the big screen. Whether or not you can swing a theatrical experience, or whether Hulu is your gateway, this is a movie that should not be missed.


4) No Sudden Move, Steven Soderbergh’s piercing crime drama, based on Ed Solomon’s twisting, turning script, is a movie for grown-ups who miss the intricacies and mysteries of Chinatown or the feints and double and triple-crosses of great films noir like The Asphalt Jungle or The Killing and wish that a spirited director, one already responsible for another great example in the genre, The Limey, might return to this particular form in glory. With No Sudden Move, that’s just what happens. Inhabited with brilliance by Don Cheadle, who hasn’t been this good since his heralded intro to the popular consciousness in Devil in a Blue Dress, and Benicio Del Toro, who seems to carry the weight of the world on his sagging frame, along with perhaps the year’s richest supporting cast, including David Harbour, Julia Fox, Amy Siemetz, Kieran Culkin, Ray Liotta, and best of all, Brendan Fraser, channeling Orson Welles in TOUCH OF EVIL here (there’s even an effective cameo by a Soderbergh favorite), the film is centered on a heist scheme that goes terribly wrong and spirals into a morass of betrayals and reprisals that at times can be challenging to track, but which ultimately land in a place where comparisons to the films cited above prove not only apt but well deserved.


5) I loved Godzilla vs. Kong. My two daughters and I had a great time with it, even if it was only on HBO Max— we turned it up loud, laughing and shouting and screaming in all the right places. But then we saw it again, this time on the big screen before it left our local multiplex. The damn thing must have taken a nation’s worth of craftsmen and artists to compose, but it lumbers not— in light of the four-hour Justice League especially, this is as fleet of foot and spirit as you could hope for in a movie about giant beasts asserting their essential (but not necessarily hostile-to-mankind) beastliness and laying waste to their surroundings, including a surreally gorgeous nighttime Hong Kong that’s neon-lit for maximum eye-popping monster fun. But the highlight for me was the mind-and-perspective boggling landscape of Hollow Earth, revealed when our human heroes travel beneath the surface to find out where the ancestors and cohabitants of Kong and Godzilla have been calling home for centuries. It’s a truly spectacular vision of a hidden world within our own that itself warrants at least a couple more viewings to be even close to fully taken in. I know, I know-- if you love cinema as an art form, you’re supposed to reflexively shun a big, loud, commercial piece of work like Godzilla vs. Kong. But screw that. The big boys (plus a surprise guest) were worth that second helping, and now that I have the Blu-ray a third is surely forthcoming. Godzilla, Kong, their surprise guest, and the disorienting grandeur of Hollow Earth await my return.

*****************