I don’t know if The
Huntsman: Winter’s War, the big, loud (except when its twin villainesses get
all whispery with evil portent) prequel/sequel to Snow White and the Huntsman that nobody was clamoring for, will end up being the year’s worst movie.
But in my book this by-the-numbers CGI-encrusted wreck certainly stands a good
chance of being the year’s most interminably, heart-hardeningly, brain-softeningly
boring movie, and maybe its most cynical one too.
(I know I hope I don’t
actually have to see a worse movie in 2016-- Odie Henderson makes an excellent case that Nina might be the one, but I will force
myself to take his word for it and avoid that picture like a plague of brown
pancake makeup.)
The problem here isn’t just that
we’ve seen this sort of paper-thin good-vs.-evil, love triumphing over hate
template thousands of times by now. (I can’t even call it a story, nor will I attempt to capsulize it.) Nor is it simply that such
a bland by-the-numbers project, a sequel to a movie millions worldwide paid to
see but nobody really liked, has had $115 million pumped into it by a major
studio desperate to chase what they think the public wants.
No, the most depressing
thing about The Huntsman: Winter’s War
is how emblematic it is of the ways in which these big-budget “spectaculars” have smothered
even the possibility of individuality, of uniqueness, of the hope for some
genuine surprise or storytelling juice. What room is there for individuality
when the numbers seem to suggest to suits the world over that people just want
to see a Lord of the Rings-Game of
Thrones hodgepodge directed as inhumanly as possible, so resembling past
triumphs and flops that what audiences are really responding to (if they
respond at all) isn’t anything actually on screen but instead the vague echoes
of pleasure which remind them of something they already saw once or twice before, something now being obscured in the dark pits of memory by this latest new, bright, flashy contraption. (Here’s
an idea: Isn’t it about time for that Willow
remake?!)
The game has calcified to such a degree that it’s actually a bad thing if one of these cash-grubbers feels like a movie made with a distinctly human perspective. Despite its visual dynamism, Speed Racer was created by people who infused their artificial world
with actual poetry, and its reward was a humiliating critical and box-office death. Something depressing sinks in while watching a monstrosity like The Huntsman: Winter's War-- for all their
technological inventiveness, the standard 21st-century studio
blockbusters so resemble one another in form and feel and sound and sensibility
that it absolutely does not matter any longer whose names are in the credits, from director on down.
The man who admits responsibility for shepherding The Huntsman: Winter’s War is one Cedric Nicolas-Troyan. Ever heard
of him? No? Who cares? He was the visual effects supervisor on Snow White and the Huntsman, and his
only other credit as a director is a short called Carrot vs. Ninja. And if The
Huntsman: Winter’s War sadly proves anything, it’s that experienced
visual effects supervisors are precisely who the studios want in the director’s chair,
because whether or not a director has experience, the overwhelming pile-up of on-screen evidence suggests that interest in or ability with
actors, or any sort of overriding directorial vision, was never a stringent requirement. Remarkably,
Emily Blunt registers some real emotion as the betrayed, then enraged Queen
Freya—how this happened is a mystery now surely being investigated by underpaid
studio flunkies. But everyone else in the cast might as well be as computer-generated
as the standard-issue post-Peter Jackson goblins which try so hard to frighten our
heroes with their loud sounds and big teeth, the same ones Charlize Theron apparently
tries to imitate in her attempt to be the scariest
queen of them all.
*******************************
No comments:
Post a Comment